Abouelnaga Walid Ahmed, Aboelnour Nancy Hassan
Physical Therapy Department for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Ann Rehabil Med. 2019 Jun;43(3):305-313. doi: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.3.305. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
To determine whether an active rehabilitation program that involves repetitive effortful muscle contractions, including core stability, balancing exercises, progressive resistance exercises, and running activities, after a sports hernia, is effective.
Forty soccer players with sports hernias were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A (active rehabilitation program) and group B (conventional treatment). The methods of assessment included a visual analog scale (VAS) and hip internal and external range of motion assessments. Group A received conventional treatment (heat, massage, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and mobilization) plus an active rehabilitation program, while group B received only conventional treatment. Three treatment sessions were given each week for 2 months. Evaluations were performed pre- and post-treatment.
A decrease in VAS was seen in both groups at the end of treatment, 80.25% in group A and 41.93% in group B. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.0001), whereas there were no statistical differences in internal and external rotation between the groups at the end of treatment (p>0.05). After treatment, an improvement in outcome measures of group A compared to group B (p=0.01) was seen. Thirteen patients in group A and only three patients in group B returned to sports activities without groin pain.
Active rehabilitation was effective for sports hernia management measured by a decrease in pain and the return to sports.
确定运动疝后进行的包括核心稳定性、平衡练习、渐进性抗阻练习和跑步活动在内的重复性高强度肌肉收缩的积极康复计划是否有效。
40名患有运动疝的足球运动员被随机分为两组,每组人数相等:A组(积极康复计划)和B组(传统治疗)。评估方法包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及髋关节内收和外展活动度评估。A组接受传统治疗(热敷、按摩、经皮电刺激神经疗法和松动术)加积极康复计划,而B组仅接受传统治疗。每周进行3次治疗,持续2个月。在治疗前后进行评估。
治疗结束时两组的VAS评分均有所下降,A组为80.25%,B组为41.93%。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.0001),而治疗结束时两组之间的内旋和外旋没有统计学差异(p>0.05)。治疗后,A组与B组相比,结局指标有所改善(p = 0.01)。A组有13名患者,B组只有3名患者在无腹股沟疼痛的情况下恢复了体育活动。
通过疼痛减轻和恢复运动来衡量,积极康复对运动疝的治疗有效。