Peterson Ross L, Vock David M, Babiker Abdel, Powers John H, Hunsberger Sally, Angus Brian, Paez Armando, Neaton James D
University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jun 21;15:100401. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100401. eCollection 2019 Sep.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Food and Drug Administration recommends research into developing well-defined and reliable endpoints to evaluate treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization. A novel 6-category ordinal endpoint of patient health status after 7 days that ranges from death to hospital discharge with resumption of normal activities is being used in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for severe influenza (FLU-IVIG). We compare the power of the ordinal endpoint under a proportional odds model to other types of endpoints as a function of various trial parameters.
We used closed-form analysis and empirical simulation to compare the power of the ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints. In the simulation setting, we varied the treatment effect and the distribution of the placebo group across the follow-up period with consideration of adjustment for baseline health status.
In the analytic setting, ordinal endpoints of high granularity provided greater power than time-to-event endpoints when most patients in the placebo group had either naturally progressed to the category of hospital discharge by day 7 or were far from hospital discharge on day 7. In the simulation setting, adjustment for baseline health status universally raised power for the proportional odds model. Across different placebo group distributions of the ordinal endpoint regardless of adjustment for baseline health status, only time-to-event endpoints yielded higher power than the ordinal endpoint for certain treatment effects.
In this case study, the FLU-IVIG ordinal endpoint provided greater power than time-to-event, binary, and longitudinal endpoints for most scenarios of the treatment effect and placebo group distribution, including the target population studied for FLU-IVIG. The ordinal endpoint was only surpassed by the time-to-event endpoint when many patients in the placebo group were on the cusp of hospital discharge on day 7 and the follow-up period for the time-to-event endpoint was extended to allow for additional events. Our general approach for evaluating the power of several potential endpoints for an influenza trial can be used for designing other influenza trials with different target populations and for other trials in other disease areas.
背景/目的:美国食品药品监督管理局建议开展研究,以开发明确且可靠的终点指标,用于评估针对需住院治疗的重症流感的治疗方法。在一项关于静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗重症流感(FLU-IVIG)的随机安慰剂对照试验中,正在使用一种新的6类有序终点指标,该指标用于评估7天后患者的健康状况,范围从死亡到出院并恢复正常活动。我们将比例优势模型下有序终点指标的检验效能与其他类型的终点指标进行比较,作为各种试验参数的函数。
我们使用闭式分析和经验模拟,将有序终点指标的检验效能与事件发生时间、纵向和二元终点指标进行比较。在模拟设置中,我们在考虑对基线健康状况进行调整的情况下,改变治疗效果和安慰剂组在随访期间的分布。
在分析设置中,当安慰剂组中的大多数患者在第7天时自然进展到出院类别或在第7天时离出院还很远时,高粒度的有序终点指标比事件发生时间终点指标具有更大的检验效能。在模拟设置中,对基线健康状况的调整普遍提高了比例优势模型的检验效能。在不考虑对基线健康状况进行调整的情况下,无论有序终点指标的安慰剂组分布如何,对于某些治疗效果,只有事件发生时间终点指标的检验效能高于有序终点指标。
在本案例研究中,对于大多数治疗效果和安慰剂组分布情况,包括FLU-IVIG研究的目标人群,FLU-IVIG有序终点指标比事件发生时间、二元和纵向终点指标具有更大的检验效能。当安慰剂组中的许多患者在第7天时处于出院边缘且事件发生时间终点指标的随访期延长以允许出现更多事件时,有序终点指标才会被事件发生时间终点指标超越。我们评估流感试验中几个潜在终点指标检验效能的一般方法可用于设计针对不同目标人群的其他流感试验以及其他疾病领域的其他试验。