Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中哮喘诊断实践和挑战的定性研究。

Qualitative study of practices and challenges when making a diagnosis of asthma in primary care.

机构信息

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Cancer and Primary Care Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Jul 17;29(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0140-z.

Abstract

Misdiagnosis (over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis) of asthma is common. Under-diagnosis can lead to avoidable morbidity and mortality, while over-diagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary side effects of treatment(s) and results in unnecessary healthcare expenditure. We explored diagnostic approaches and challenges faced by general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses when making a diagnosis of asthma. Fifteen healthcare professionals (10 GPs and 5 nurses) of both sexes, different ages and varying years of experience who worked in NHS Lothian, Scotland were interviewed using in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach. Clinical judgement of the probability of asthma was fundamental in the diagnostic process. Participants used heuristic approaches to assess the clinical probability of asthma and then decide what tests to do, selecting peak expiratory flow measurements, spirometry and/or a trial of treatment as appropriate for each patient. Challenges in the diagnostic process included time pressures, the variable nature of asthma, overlapping clinical features of asthma with other conditions such as respiratory viral illnesses in children and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults. To improve diagnostic decision-making, participants suggested regular educational opportunities and better diagnostic tools. In the future, standardising the clinical assessment made by healthcare practitioners should be supported by improved access to diagnostic services for additional investigation(s) and clarification of diagnostic uncertainty.

摘要

哮喘的误诊(过度诊断和漏诊)很常见。漏诊可导致可避免的发病和死亡,而过度诊断则使患者面临治疗的不必要副作用,并导致不必要的医疗支出。我们探讨了全科医生(GP)和执业护士在诊断哮喘时所采用的诊断方法和面临的挑战。我们采访了来自苏格兰 NHS 洛锡安的 15 名医疗保健专业人员(10 名全科医生和 5 名护士),他们的性别、年龄和工作经验各不相同。采用深入的半结构化定性访谈收集数据。使用主题分析方法对转录本进行分析。对哮喘可能性的临床判断是诊断过程的基础。参与者使用启发式方法来评估哮喘的临床可能性,然后决定进行哪些测试,为每个患者选择合适的峰流速测量、肺功能检查和/或治疗试验。诊断过程中的挑战包括时间压力、哮喘的多变性质、哮喘与其他疾病(如儿童呼吸道病毒感染和成人慢性阻塞性肺疾病)的重叠临床特征。为了改善诊断决策,参与者建议提供定期教育机会和更好的诊断工具。未来,应通过改善获得额外检查和明确诊断不确定性的诊断服务来支持标准化医疗保健从业者的临床评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Gas cooking and respiratory outcomes in children: A systematic review.儿童燃气烹饪与呼吸健康结局:一项系统综述
Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 17;5:100107. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100107. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
After asthma: redefining airways diseases.哮喘之后:重新定义气道疾病。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):350-400. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30879-6. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
3
Publishing qualitative research in medical journals.在医学期刊上发表定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 May;67(658):229-230. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X690821.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验