Suppr超能文献

使用超广角正面光学相干断层扫描血管造影术鉴别视网膜动脉和静脉的准确性和可靠性

Accuracy and Reliability in Differentiating Retinal Arteries and Veins Using Widefield En Face OCT Angiography.

作者信息

Ishibazawa Akihiro, Mehta Nihaal, Sorour Osama, Braun Phillip, Martin Sarah, Alibhai A Yasin, Saifuddin Adnan, Arya Malvika, Baumal Caroline R, Duker Jay S, Waheed Nadia K

机构信息

New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Ophthalmology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Jun 28;8(3):60. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.3.60. eCollection 2019 May.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability in differentiating retinal arteries from veins using widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

METHODS

Ten healthy eyes and 12 eyes from diabetic patients were included. Foveal-centered swept-source OCTA images (12 × 12 mm) were obtained using the PLEX Elite 9000. Vessels were graded as arteries or veins by two independent, masked readers. Arteriovenous crossings were also evaluated in healthy eyes. The vessel identification gold standard was defined using color fundus photographs (CFP) for normal eyes and both CFP and fluorescein angiography for diabetic eyes. Grading accuracy was compared to the gold standard and reliability between readers assessed.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 538 vessels (119 first order, 110 second, 309 third) in healthy eyes and 645 vessels (184 first order, 159 second, 302 third). In healthy eyes, the average accuracies identifying all, first-, second-, and third-order vessels were 98.61%, 99.16%, 100%, and 98.06%, respectively. Cohen's κ between graders in all vessels was 0.948. In diabetic eyes, the average accuracies identifying vessels were 96.90%, 99.46%, 97.77%, and 94.85%, respectively. Cohen's κ between graders for all vessels was 0.888. For crossing identification, the average accuracy and Cohen's κ were low (60.71% and 0.659, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

En face OCTA allows for accurate and reliable artery and vein identification; for small branches and crossings, identification by en face OCTA alone may be less accurate and reliable.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Arteries and veins can be differentiated on OCTA, assisting in clinically identifying pathology as arterial or venous side.

摘要

目的

利用广角光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)评估区分视网膜动脉与静脉的准确性和可靠性。

方法

纳入10只健康眼和12只糖尿病患者的眼睛。使用PLEX Elite 9000获取以黄斑为中心的扫频源OCTA图像(12×12毫米)。由两名独立的、不知情的阅片者将血管分为动脉或静脉。还对健康眼中的动静脉交叉处进行了评估。正常眼使用彩色眼底照片(CFP),糖尿病眼使用CFP和荧光素血管造影来定义血管识别的金标准。将分级准确性与金标准进行比较,并评估阅片者之间的可靠性。

结果

该研究评估了健康眼中的538条血管(119条一级血管、110条二级血管、309条三级血管)和糖尿病眼中的645条血管(184条一级血管、159条二级血管、302条三级血管)。在健康眼中,识别所有血管、一级血管、二级血管和三级血管的平均准确率分别为98.61%、99.16%、100%和98.06%。所有血管分级者之间的Cohen's κ为0.948。在糖尿病眼中,识别血管的平均准确率分别为96.90%、99.46%、97.77%和94.85%。所有血管分级者之间的Cohen's κ为0.888。对于交叉处识别,平均准确率和Cohen's κ较低(分别为60.71%和0.659)。

结论

OCTA正面成像能够准确可靠地识别动脉和静脉;对于小分支和交叉处,仅通过OCTA正面成像识别可能不太准确和可靠。

转化相关性

动脉和静脉在OCTA上可被区分,有助于临床鉴别病变是在动脉侧还是静脉侧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/585e/6602142/83e1644081e3/i2164-2591-8-3-60-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验