Aabe Nura O, Fox Fiona, Rai Dheeraj, Redwood Sabi
Autism Independence, Bristol, UK.
National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West) and Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):752-760. doi: 10.1111/hex.12939. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Co-production is predicated on equal power-sharing and responsibility in research partnerships. However, relatively few accounts exist that explore the subjective experience of how co-researchers achieve such equality, from the perspectives of public contributors and researchers.
This paper aims to provide a unique insight into the process of co-production, by weaving personal reflections with principles to evaluate the impact arising from co-produced knowledge. It is based upon participatory research that was initiated by a 'lay' person, on behalf of a community organization, seeking support for Somali families who are affected by autism. The paper explores the evolving partnerships that began with community theatre and qualitative research and leading to extensive dissemination and impact, all of which has been jointly owned and negotiated by the co-researchers and community organizations.
Initially, this paper reflects on the process, drawing on principles defined for co-production in health research and combining it with the co-researcher's personal reflections of their experiences as insiders and outsiders, stepping in and out of each other's worlds. The value of reciprocity, flexibility and continuous reflection is illustrated. The latter part of the paper explores the impact of this co-produced knowledge using a theoretical framework, to assess the specific impacts and its broader transformative potential. It demonstrates how (1) opportunities for all partners to be equitably involved to the maximum degree possible throughout the research process can affect social change and (2) co-produced research can become a catalyst that is dynamic and complex, achieving multi-layered impact.
合作生产基于研究伙伴关系中的平等权力共享和责任分担。然而,从公众贡献者和研究人员的角度出发,探索共同研究者如何实现这种平等的主观体验的描述相对较少。
本文旨在通过将个人反思与评估合作生产知识所产生影响的原则相结合,为合作生产过程提供独特的见解。它基于一项由一位“非专业”人士代表社区组织发起的参与式研究,该组织为受自闭症影响的索马里家庭寻求支持。本文探讨了从社区戏剧和定性研究开始,到广泛传播和产生影响的不断发展的伙伴关系,所有这些都是由共同研究者和社区组织共同拥有并协商的。
本文首先反思这一过程,借鉴健康研究中为合作生产定义的原则,并将其与共同研究者作为内部人和外部人对自身经历的个人反思相结合,他们穿梭于彼此的世界。文中阐述了互惠、灵活性和持续反思的价值。本文的后半部分使用一个理论框架探讨了这种合作生产知识的影响,以评估其具体影响及其更广泛的变革潜力。它展示了:(1)在整个研究过程中,所有伙伴尽可能公平地充分参与的机会如何能够影响社会变革;(2)合作生产的研究如何能够成为一个动态且复杂的催化剂,实现多层次的影响。