Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Nov;33(11):2039-2049. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15813. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
Pityriasis lichenoides (PL) represents a spectrum of inflammatory skin diseases comprising pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) and pityriasis lichenoides chronica (PLC). This study aimed to provide a summary of effective treatments for PL. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies investigating PL treatment including ≥3 subjects and published in English between 1 January 1970 and 15 April 2019. A total of 441 papers were screened, and 37 original manuscripts meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were found, including 12 case series, 18 reviews, four prospective studies, two comparative studies and a single randomized controlled study. In most studies, ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy (narrow-band UVB, broadband UVB, UVA1 or PUVA) was used. Clearance rates with the different modalities are hardly comparable between different studies, ranging approximately between 70% and 100%. Narrow-band UVB showed an efficacy similar to PUVA as such as the combination of UVA and UVB vs. PUVA. Oral erythromycin showed clearance rates ranging between 66% and 83%, whereas methotrexate up to 100% but in small and dated studies. Evidence for other treatments is scarce. There is a lack of high level of evidence studies on PL treatment. The interpretation of the results is biased by the possible auto-resolution of the disease, the sample heterogeneity between children and adults and the short follow-up period of the studies. Only some studies investigated how results were durable after cessation of therapy. Quality of life and the impact of treatment were never assessed. According to the results of this review, we suggest narrow-band UVB phototherapy as first-line treatment. Oral erythromycin with or without topical corticosteroids and low-dose methotrexate as second-line therapies. High-powered studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the optimal treatment for PL.
苔藓样糠疹(PL)代表了一组炎症性皮肤疾病,包括急性苔藓样糠疹样疹和疱疹样(PLEVA)和慢性苔藓样糠疹(PLC)。本研究旨在为 PL 提供有效的治疗方法总结。根据 PRISMA 指南对包括≥3 名患者并于 1970 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 15 日期间以英文发表的研究进行了系统回顾。共筛选了 441 篇论文,发现了 37 篇符合纳入和排除标准的原始手稿,包括 12 篇病例系列、18 篇综述、4 项前瞻性研究、2 项比较研究和 1 项单随机对照研究。在大多数研究中,使用了紫外线(UV)光疗(窄带 UVB、宽带 UVB、UVA1 或 PUVA)。不同研究之间不同方式的清除率几乎无法比较,范围约在 70%至 100%之间。窄带 UVB 显示出与 PUVA 相似的疗效,例如 UVA 和 UVB 与 PUVA 的联合。口服红霉素的清除率在 66%至 83%之间,而甲氨蝶呤高达 100%,但在规模较小且陈旧的研究中。其他治疗方法的证据很少。关于 PL 治疗的高级别证据研究缺乏。由于疾病可能自行缓解、儿童和成人样本之间的异质性以及研究随访时间短,结果的解释存在偏差。只有一些研究调查了治疗停止后结果的持久性。从未评估过生活质量和治疗的影响。根据本综述的结果,我们建议窄带 UVB 光疗作为一线治疗。口服红霉素联合或不联合外用皮质类固醇和低剂量甲氨蝶呤作为二线治疗。需要进行高质量的研究和随机对照试验,以确定 PL 的最佳治疗方法。