From the Comprehensive Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, CA.
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2156-2162. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025080. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Background and Purpose- TNK (tenecteplase), a newer fibrinolytic agent, has practical delivery advantages over ALT (alteplase) that would make it a useful agent if noninferior in acute ischemic stroke treatment outcome. Accordingly, the most recent US American Heart Association/American Stroke Association acute ischemic stroke guideline recognized TNK as an alternative to ALT, but only based on informal consideration, rather than formal meta-analysis, of completed randomized control trials. Methods- Systematic literature search and formal meta-analysis were conducted per PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), adapted to noninferiority analysis. The primary outcome of freedom from disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) outcome at 3 m, and additional efficacy and safety outcomes, were analyzed. Results- Systematic search identified 5 trials enrolling 1585 patients (828 TNK, 757 ALT). Across all trials, mean age was 70.8, 58.5% male, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale mean 7.0, and time from last known well to treatment start mean 148 minutes. All ALT patients received standard 0.9 mg/kg dosing, while TNK dosing was 0.1 mg/kg in 6.8%, 0.25 mg/kg in 24.6%, and 0.4 mg/kg in 68.6%. For the primary end point, crude cumulative rates of disability-free (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) 3 m outcome were TNK 57.9% versus ALT 55.4%. Informal, random-effects meta-analysis, the risk difference was 4% (95% CI, -1% to 8%). The lower 95% CI bound fell well within the prespecified noninferiority margin. Similar results were seen for the additional efficacy end points: functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2): crude TNK 71.9% versus ALT 70.5%, risk difference 2% (95% CI, -3% to 6%); and modified Rankin Scale shift analysis, common odds ratio 1.21 (95% CI, 0.93-1.57). For safety end points, lower event rates reduced power, but point estimates were also consistent with noninferiority Conclusions- Accumulated clinical trial data provides strong evidence that TNK is noninferior to ALT in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. These findings provide formal support for the recent guideline recommendation to consider TNK an alternative to ALT.
背景与目的-TNK(替奈普酶)是一种新型纤维蛋白溶解剂,与 ALT(阿替普酶)相比具有实际的给药优势,如果在急性缺血性脑卒中的治疗结果方面不劣于 ALT,那么它将是一种有用的药物。因此,最近的美国心脏协会/美国中风协会急性缺血性脑卒中指南将 TNK 认可为 ALT 的替代药物,但仅基于对已完成的随机对照试验的非正式考虑,而不是正式的荟萃分析。方法-根据 PRISMA 指南(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)进行系统文献检索和正式荟萃分析,适应非劣效性分析。主要结局为 3 个月时无残疾(改良 Rankin 量表评分,0-1),以及其他疗效和安全性结局。结果-系统搜索确定了 5 项纳入 1585 例患者(828 例 TNK,757 例 ALT)的试验。所有试验中,平均年龄为 70.8 岁,58.5%为男性,基线国立卫生研究院卒中量表平均 7.0,从最后一次已知健康到治疗开始的时间平均为 148 分钟。所有 ALT 患者均接受标准 0.9mg/kg 剂量,而 TNK 剂量为 0.1mg/kg 的占 6.8%,0.25mg/kg 的占 24.6%,0.4mg/kg 的占 68.6%。对于主要终点,3 个月时无残疾(改良 Rankin 量表评分,0-1)的累积无残疾率为 TNK 57.9%,而 ALT 为 55.4%。非正式、随机效应荟萃分析,风险差异为 4%(95%置信区间,-1%至 8%)。下限 95%置信区间很好地落在预设的非劣效性边界内。对于其他疗效终点也有类似的结果:功能独立性(改良 Rankin 量表评分,0-2):TNK 为 71.9%,ALT 为 70.5%,风险差异为 2%(95%置信区间,-3%至 6%);以及改良 Rankin 量表移位分析,常见比值比为 1.21(95%置信区间,0.93-1.57)。对于安全性终点,较低的事件发生率降低了效力,但点估计也与非劣效性一致。结论-累积的临床试验数据提供了强有力的证据,表明 TNK 在急性缺血性脑卒中的治疗中不劣于 ALT。这些发现为最近的指南建议将 TNK 视为 ALT 的替代药物提供了正式支持。