Kaur Harmanpreet, Fisher Karoline, Othman Maha
Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, School of Medicine.
Office of the University Veterinarians, Queen's University.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2019 Oct;30(7):366-369. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000836.
: Blood collection is critical for mouse research studies particularly in hemostatic testing. Cardiac puncture; a standard effective method requires anesthesia and is a terminal procedure while facial vein technique allows multiple collections. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a global hemostasis test, provides a dynamic real-time picture of coagulation. However, TEG experiments in mice require large number of animals and may not allow pre/postinterventions assessment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of facial vein sampling for TEG analysis as an alternative to cardiac puncture and examined the impact on coagulation results. Blood samples were obtained from a total of 10 C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice via cardiac puncture and a total of another eight mice of similar strains via facial vein sampling. We compared TEG parameters in both methods using descriptive statistics and the Student t test. Results show no significant difference in any of the TEG parameters between cardiac and facial vein blood indicating the two methods are comparable. Facial vein sampling provides a less costly alternative to cardiac puncture. It is a suitable blood collection method for pre/postinterventions or follow-up studies and it better addresses reduction and refinement goals in mouse studies. A larger study to evaluate the sex or strain and genetic background differences will be valuable.
血液采集对于小鼠研究尤其是止血测试至关重要。心脏穿刺是一种标准的有效方法,但需要麻醉且是一种终末操作,而面部静脉采血技术则允许多次采集。血栓弹力图(TEG)是一种全面的止血测试,可提供凝血的动态实时图像。然而,小鼠的TEG实验需要大量动物,并且可能无法进行干预前/后的评估。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨面部静脉采血用于TEG分析作为心脏穿刺替代方法的可行性,并研究其对凝血结果的影响。通过心脏穿刺从总共10只C57BL/6和CD-1小鼠获取血样,通过面部静脉采血从另外总共8只相同品系的小鼠获取血样。我们使用描述性统计和学生t检验比较了两种方法中的TEG参数。结果显示,心脏穿刺血样和面部静脉血样的任何TEG参数均无显著差异,表明这两种方法具有可比性。面部静脉采血是一种比心脏穿刺成本更低的替代方法。它是适用于干预前/后或随访研究的血液采集方法,并且能更好地实现小鼠研究中的减少和优化目标。一项评估性别、品系和遗传背景差异的更大规模研究将很有价值。