• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于REDCap的电子同意书(eConsent)模型:迈向更个性化的同意书。

A REDCap-based model for electronic consent (eConsent): Moving toward a more personalized consent.

作者信息

Lawrence Colleen E, Dunkel Leah, McEver Mark, Israel Tiffany, Taylor Robert, Chiriboga Germán, Goins Karin Valentine, Rahn Elizabeth J, Mudano Amy S, Roberson Erik D, Chambless Carol, Wadley Virginia G, Danila Maria I, Fischer Melissa A, Joosten Yvonne, Saag Kenneth G, Allison Jeroan J, Lemon Stephenie C, Harris Paul A

机构信息

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Vanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 3;4(4):345-353. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.30.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2020.30
PMID:33244416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7681162/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The updated common rule, for human subjects research, requires that consents "begin with a 'concise and focused' presentation of the key information that will most likely help someone make a decision about whether to participate in a study" (Menikoff, Kaneshiro, Pritchard. . 2017; (7): 613-615.). We utilized a community-engaged technology development approach to inform feature options within the REDCap software platform centered around collection and storage of electronic consent (eConsent) to address issues of transparency, clinical trial efficiency, and regulatory compliance for informed consent (Harris, et al. 2009; (2): 377-381.). eConsent may also improve recruitment and retention in clinical research studies by addressing: (1) barriers for accessing rural populations by facilitating remote consent and (2) cultural and literacy barriers by including optional explanatory material (e.g., defining terms by hovering over them with the cursor) or the choice of displaying different videos/images based on participant's race, ethnicity, or educational level (Phillippi, et al. . 2018; (4): 529-534.).

METHODS

We developed and pilot tested our eConsent framework to provide a personalized consent experience whereby users are guided through a consent document that utilizes avatars, contextual glossary information supplements, and videos, to facilitate communication of information.

RESULTS

The eConsent framework includes a portfolio of eight features, reviewed by community stakeholders, and tested at two academic medical centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Early adoption and utilization of this eConsent framework have demonstrated acceptability. Next steps will emphasize testing efficacy of features to improve participant engagement with the consent process.

摘要

引言

针对人类受试者研究的更新后的通用规则要求,同意书“应以‘简洁且重点突出’的方式呈现最有可能帮助某人决定是否参与研究的关键信息”(梅尼科夫、卡内希罗、普里查德……2017;(7):613 - 615)。我们采用了社区参与的技术开发方法,以确定REDCap软件平台中的功能选项,该平台围绕电子同意书(eConsent)的收集和存储展开,以解决透明度、临床试验效率和知情同意的法规合规性问题(哈里斯等人……2009;(2):377 - 381)。电子同意书还可以通过解决以下问题来提高临床研究中的招募和留存率:(1)通过促进远程同意来消除接触农村人口的障碍,以及(2)通过包含可选的解释性材料(例如,通过将光标悬停在术语上进行定义)或根据参与者的种族、民族或教育水平选择显示不同的视频/图像来消除文化和识字障碍(菲利普等人……2018;(4):529 - 534)。

方法

我们开发并进行了电子同意书框架的试点测试,以提供个性化的同意体验,即引导用户浏览一份利用虚拟化身、上下文词汇表信息补充和视频的同意文件,以促进信息交流。

结果

电子同意书框架包括一组由社区利益相关者审查并在两个学术医疗中心进行测试的八个功能。

结论

该电子同意书框架的早期采用和使用已证明具有可接受性。下一步将着重测试功能的有效性,以提高参与者对同意过程的参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/7681162/d60a28c0f415/S2059866120000308_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/7681162/54f02536f52e/S2059866120000308_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/7681162/d60a28c0f415/S2059866120000308_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/7681162/54f02536f52e/S2059866120000308_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6df/7681162/d60a28c0f415/S2059866120000308_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A REDCap-based model for electronic consent (eConsent): Moving toward a more personalized consent.一种基于REDCap的电子同意书(eConsent)模型:迈向更个性化的同意书。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Apr 3;4(4):345-353. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.30.
2
Approaches and experiences implementing remote, electronic consent at the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit.在利兹临床试验研究单位实施远程电子同意的方法和经验。
Trials. 2024 May 8;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08149-y.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
4
Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.应用程序介导的帕金森病mPower研究中参与者对移动电子同意书体验的形成性评估:一项混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Feb 16;5(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6521.
5
Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.基于REDCap的工作流程评估,以支持联邦电子知情同意指南
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:163-172. eCollection 2019.
6
Awareness and Collaboration Across Stakeholder Groups Important for eConsent Achieving Value-Driven Adoption.各利益相关者群体之间的意识与协作对于电子同意书实现价值驱动型采用至关重要。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):724-735. doi: 10.1177/2168479019861924. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Differences in eConsent among diagnosis groups.各诊断组之间电子同意书的差异。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Aug 21;35:101200. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101200. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
9
Evaluation of a group-based online informed consent conversation (eConsent) in participants from a low-risk vaccination clinical trial.评价一项基于群组的在线知情同意对话(eConsent)在低风险疫苗临床试验参与者中的应用。
Trials. 2024 Aug 7;25(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08367-4.
10
Development of a multi-component intervention to promote participation of Black and Latinx individuals in biomedical research.开发一种多成分干预措施,以促进黑人和拉丁裔个体参与生物医学研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jun 14;5(1):e134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.797. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling hidden connections: How social networks impact diversion in hospital emergency departments: An exploratory social network analysis.揭示隐藏的联系:社交网络如何影响医院急诊科的药物转移:一项探索性社会网络分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0329176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329176. eCollection 2025.
2
Replication of Sensor-Based Categorization of Upper-Limb Performance in Daily Life in People Post Stroke and Generalizability to Other Populations.基于传感器的中风后人群日常生活中上肢运动表现分类的复制及对其他人群的可推广性
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;25(15):4618. doi: 10.3390/s25154618.
3
Minimum effective dose of a multicomponent behaviour change intervention to increase the physical activity of individuals on primary statin therapy: an adaptive study using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM).

本文引用的文献

1
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
A collaborative, academic approach to optimizing the national clinical research infrastructure: The first year of the Trial Innovation Network.一种优化国家临床研究基础设施的协作性学术方法:试验创新网络的第一年。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):187-192. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.319. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
3
Webside Manner: A Key to High-Quality Primary Care Telemedicine for All.
多成分行为改变干预措施增加接受一级他汀治疗个体身体活动量的最小有效剂量:一项采用事件发生时间连续重新评估法(TiTE-CRM)的适应性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):e090789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090789.
4
Seeking connection: A qualitative study of psychosocial support needs of rural cancer survivors in Minnesota.寻求联系:明尼苏达州农村癌症幸存者心理社会支持需求的定性研究
J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;41(3):e70066. doi: 10.1111/jrh.70066.
5
Audio and linguistic prediction of objective and subjective cognition in older adults: what is the role of different prompts?老年人客观和主观认知的听觉及语言预测:不同提示的作用是什么?
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;16:1596132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1596132. eCollection 2025.
6
Ethical Issues in International Research in Pediatric Psychology: Challenges and Opportunities.儿科心理学国际研究中的伦理问题:挑战与机遇
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s10880-025-10087-z.
7
Development, implementation and evaluation of a digital treatment for adolescents with chronic pain: a protocol for a multi-phase study.针对慢性疼痛青少年的数字疗法的开发、实施与评估:一项多阶段研究方案
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 4;7:1555733. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1555733. eCollection 2025.
8
StandUPTV: a full-factorial optimization trial to reduce sedentary screen time among adults.站立式电视:一项减少成年人久坐屏幕时间的全因子优化试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jun 13;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01771-2.
9
Psychological profiles of patients reporting with musculoskeletal shoulder or elbow pain.报告有肩部或肘部肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者的心理特征。
JSES Int. 2025 Mar 13;9(3):871-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.02.006. eCollection 2025 May.
10
Building Emotional Awareness and Mental Health (BEAM): study protocol for a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of the BEAM app-based program for parents with clinical mental health problems.建立情绪意识与心理健康(BEAM):一项针对有临床心理健康问题的父母的基于BEAM应用程序的混合实施-效果试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06964-4.
网站礼仪:实现全民高质量初级保健远程医疗的关键。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Nov;25(11):1007-1011. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0274. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Informed consent in refractive surgery: in-person vs telemedicine approach.屈光手术中的知情同意:面对面与远程医疗方式
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 29;12:2459-2470. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S183249. eCollection 2018.
5
Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.超越边缘:在研究中切实纳入弱势群体面临的挑战
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;46(1):30-43. doi: 10.1177/1073110518766006. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
Electronic Informed Consent to Facilitate Recruitment of Pregnant Women Into Research.促进孕妇参与研究招募的电子知情同意书。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Jul;47(4):529-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.04.134.
7
A pragmatic randomized trial comparing tablet computer informed consent to traditional paper-based methods for an osteoporosis study.一项比较平板电脑知情同意书与传统纸质方法用于骨质疏松症研究的实用性随机试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Feb 17;3:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.02.003. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
8
Utilization of a Smartphone Platform for Electronic Informed Consent in Acute Stroke Trials.智能手机平台在急性中风试验中用于电子知情同意书的应用
Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3156-3160. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018380. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
Psychometric Development of the Research and Knowledge Scale.研究与知识量表的心理测量学发展
Med Care. 2017 Feb;55(2):117-124. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000629.
10
Barriers to Change in the Informed Consent Process: A Systematic Literature Review.知情同意过程中的变革障碍:一项系统文献综述
IRB. 2016 May-Jun;38(3):1-10.