Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Depression and Anxiety/Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(4):1209-1216. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190413.
We recently reported frequent use of opioids among elderly with dementia. Discrepancies in clinical practice may in part explain the higher use of opioids in elderly with dementia, which geographical variation may be able to clarify.
To investigate geographical variation in opioid use in elderly with dementia compared to elderly without dementia.
Register-based cross-sectional study in the entire elderly (≥65 years) population of Denmark in 2015. Data included place of residence, prescriptions, and discharge diagnoses from hospital contacts. Prevalence of opioid use among elderly with (n = 36,014) and without dementia (n = 1,011,787) was compared nationwide across the five Danish regions using logistic regression analysis and for the 98 municipalities using age and sex standardization.
32.5% of elderly with dementia and 16.9% without were treated with an opioid in 2015. For home-living elderly with dementia, there was a 4-fold difference in opioid use (9.4 to 36.8%) between municipalities compared to a 1.6-fold (12.7 to 20.2%) difference for elderly without. In nursing home residents there was a 2-fold difference (dementia: 26.5 to 55.2%; no dementia: 31.8 to 60.4%). Differences between the five regions were minor.
Opioid use in elderly with dementia was frequent and almost twice as high compared to elderly without dementia, which may challenge patient safety. The pronounced geographical variations at municipality level, particularly among elderly with dementia, indicate differences in the approach to treatment of chronic pain in primary care. Our study suggests that more guidance on treatment of pain in elderly with dementia is needed.
我们最近报道了痴呆症老年患者中阿片类药物的频繁使用。临床实践中的差异可能部分解释了痴呆症老年患者中阿片类药物使用较高的原因,而地域差异可能能够阐明这一点。
调查痴呆症老年患者与非痴呆症老年患者相比,阿片类药物使用的地域差异。
这是一项 2015 年在丹麦所有老年人群(≥65 岁)中进行的基于登记的横断面研究。数据包括居住地、处方和医院就诊的出院诊断。使用逻辑回归分析比较了全国范围内五个丹麦地区痴呆症(n=36014)和非痴呆症(n=1011787)老年患者的阿片类药物使用情况,并使用年龄和性别标准化对 98 个市进行了比较。
2015 年,32.5%的痴呆症老年患者和 16.9%的非痴呆症老年患者接受了阿片类药物治疗。对于居住在社区的痴呆症老年患者,与非痴呆症老年患者(12.7%至 20.2%)相比,阿片类药物使用差异高达 4 倍(9.4%至 36.8%)。在疗养院居民中,差异增加了 2 倍(痴呆症:26.5%至 55.2%;无痴呆症:31.8%至 60.4%)。五个地区之间的差异较小。
痴呆症老年患者的阿片类药物使用非常频繁,几乎是无痴呆症老年患者的两倍,这可能对患者安全构成挑战。在市级层面,特别是在痴呆症老年患者中,明显的地域差异表明在初级保健中治疗慢性疼痛的方法存在差异。我们的研究表明,需要为痴呆症老年患者的疼痛治疗提供更多指导。