Lodder J, Dennis M S, Van Raak L, Jones L N, Warlow C P
Department of Neurology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, University of Limburg, The Netherlands.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 May 21;296(6634):1435-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1435.
The benefits of long term anticoagulant treatment of patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and cerebral infarction were studied by comparing two series of patients with stroke from centres with different policies on anticoagulant treatment. The long term prognosis of 50 patients from the Oxfordshire community stroke project, who did not receive anticoagulants, was compared with that of 70 similar patients from Maastricht, who were treated with anticoagulants. After a mean follow up of 27 months there was no significant difference in either the rate of survival or the rate of recurrent stroke between the two groups. These data suggest that any benefit of anticoagulation is modest. A large randomised trial is planned to establish whether long term anticoagulant treatment is of value and, if so, to what extent.
通过比较来自对抗凝治疗有不同政策的中心的两组中风患者,研究了非风湿性心房颤动和脑梗死患者长期抗凝治疗的益处。将牛津郡社区中风项目中未接受抗凝治疗的50例患者的长期预后与马斯特里赫特的70例接受抗凝治疗的类似患者的长期预后进行了比较。平均随访27个月后,两组之间的生存率或复发性中风发生率均无显著差异。这些数据表明抗凝治疗的任何益处都是适度的。计划进行一项大型随机试验,以确定长期抗凝治疗是否有价值,如果有价值,程度如何。