van Merwijk G, Lodder J, Bamford J, Kester A D
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Neurol. 1990 Jun;237(3):205-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00314595.
To calculate how often non-valvular atrial fibrillation should be considered as the cause of ischaemic stroke rather than an incidental finding as in primary cerebral haemorrhage, the frequency of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in 75 consecutive patients with primary intracerebral haemorrhage was compared with that in 63 patients with cortical infarcts and 44 patients with lacunar infarcts who were taken at random from 1487 consecutive patients with cerebral infarcts admitted during the same period. The frequency of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in lacunar infarcts did not differ from that in primary intracerebral haemorrhage (odds ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-5.1) (P = 1.0), whereas it was significantly higher in cortical infarcts (odds ratio: 5.57; 95% confidence interval 2.00-15.4) (P = 0.0001). Our findings suggest that non-valvular atrial fibrillation in lacunar infarcts, as in primary intracerebral haemorrhage, is unlikely to be the cause of this type of stroke, whereas perhaps 30% of all cortical infarcts are not caused by non-valvular atrial fibrillation when present. These data are important for the planning and explanatory evaluation of trials on the preventive effect of anticoagulants in stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
为了确定非瓣膜性心房颤动在缺血性卒中中应被视为病因的频率,而非像在原发性脑出血中那样被视为偶然发现,我们比较了75例连续原发性脑出血患者中非瓣膜性心房颤动的频率,以及从同期收治的1487例连续脑梗死患者中随机选取的63例皮质梗死患者和44例腔隙性梗死患者中非瓣膜性心房颤动的频率。腔隙性梗死患者中非瓣膜性心房颤动的频率与原发性脑出血患者无差异(优势比:1.28;95%置信区间:0.32 - 5.1)(P = 1.0),而在皮质梗死患者中显著更高(优势比:5.57;95%置信区间2.00 - 15.4)(P = 0.0001)。我们的研究结果表明,与原发性脑出血一样,腔隙性梗死中的非瓣膜性心房颤动不太可能是此类卒中的病因,而在所有皮质梗死中,约30%并非由存在的非瓣膜性心房颤动所致。这些数据对于非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中患者抗凝预防效果试验的规划和解释性评估具有重要意义。