Suppr超能文献

医院入院率的差异是否会影响标准化医院死亡率的比较?一项基于人群的队列研究。

Do variations in hospital admission rates bias comparisons of standardized hospital mortality rates? A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Health Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, UK.

Health Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care, The University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;235:112409. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112409. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardized mortality rates are routinely used as measures of hospital performance and quality. Such metrics may, however, be biased if hospital admission thresholds differ and patient severity is not fully measured.

AIM

To examine whether comparisons of hospital mortality rates suffer from selection bias due to variations in hospital admission rates, using the example of variations by day of the week.

DATA

12,900,687 emergency department attendances and 3,418,446 unplanned admissions to all acute non-specialist hospitals of the National Health Service in England between 1 April 2013 and 28 February 2014.

METHODS

Population-based retrospective cohort study. Mortality within 30 days of attendance is modelled as a function of weekend or weekday attendance and hospital-level predictors of admission rates using patient-level risk-adjusted probit and bivariate Heckman selection models. Robustness is supported by the use of different hospital-level predictors.

RESULTS

When examining only the admitted population, patients admitted to hospital at weekends have a 0.206 percentage point higher risk of death within 30 days compared to patients admitted during the week. However, patients attending emergency departments at weekends have a 1.390 percentage point lower probability of being admitted to hospital. Once this selection bias is accounted for, the weekend effect in mortality is reduced by two-thirds to a 0.068 percentage point increase in the risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons of standardized hospital mortality rates following unplanned admissions can be biased by variations in emergency department admission rates, leading to incorrect conclusions about quality. The use of mortality as a performance measure could therefore lead to misleading comparisons if admission rates vary and illness severity is not fully controlled for. Accounting for sample selection bias and dependence between admission and mortality rates is vital if accurate comparisons of hospital performance are to be made.

摘要

背景

标准化死亡率通常被用作衡量医院绩效和质量的指标。然而,如果医院入院门槛不同,且患者严重程度未得到充分评估,这些指标可能存在偏差。

目的

以一周中不同天的差异为例,通过检查医院死亡率的比较是否因入院率的变化而存在选择偏差,来评估这种偏差是否存在。

数据

2013 年 4 月 1 日至 2014 年 2 月 28 日期间,英国国民保健服务体系所有非专科急症医院 12900687 例急诊就诊和 3418446 例非计划性入院的数据。

方法

基于人群的回顾性队列研究。利用患者风险调整后的概率比例和双变量 Hechman 选择模型,将 30 天内死亡率作为周末或工作日就诊与医院入院率的预测因素的函数进行建模。通过使用不同的医院水平预测因素,支持稳健性。

结果

仅在观察入院人群时,周末入院的患者在 30 天内死亡的风险比周内入院的患者高 0.206 个百分点。然而,在周末就诊的患者被收治入院的可能性低 1.390 个百分点。一旦考虑到这种选择偏差,死亡率的周末效应就会减少三分之二,死亡风险增加 0.068 个百分点。

结论

对非计划性入院后标准化医院死亡率的比较可能会因急诊入院率的变化而产生偏差,从而导致对质量的错误结论。如果入院率存在差异且未充分控制疾病严重程度,使用死亡率作为绩效指标可能会导致误导性的比较。如果要准确比较医院绩效,就必须考虑到入院和死亡率之间的样本选择偏差和相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验