Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Central City Concern, Portland, OR, USA.
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2122-2136. doi: 10.1111/add.14755. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
Addiction to methamphetamine/amphetamine (MA/A) is a major public health problem. Currently there are no pharmacotherapies for MA/A use disorder that have been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency. We reviewed the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for MA/A use disorder to assess the quality, publication bias and overall strength of the evidence.
Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched multiple data sources (MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) to April 2019 for systematic reviews (SRs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Included studies recruited adults who had MA/A use disorder; sample sizes ranged from 19 to 229 participants. Outcomes of interest were abstinence, defined as 3 or more consecutive weeks with negative urine drug screens (UDS); overall use, analyzed as the proportion of MA/A negative UDS specimens; and treatment retention. One SR of pharmacotherapies for MA/A use disorder and 17 additional RCTs met our inclusion criteria encompassing 17 different drugs (antidepressants, antipsychotics, psychostimulants, anticonvulsants and opioid antagonists). We combined the findings of trials with comparable interventions and outcome measures in random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed quality, publication bias and the strength of evidence for each outcome using standardized criteria.
There was low-strength evidence from two RCTs that methylphenidate may reduce MA/A use: 6.5 versus 2.8% MA/A-negative UDS in one study (n = 34, P = 0.008) and 23 versus 16% in another study (n = 54, P = 0.047). Antidepressants as a class had no statistically significant effect on abstinence or retention on the basis of moderate strength evidence. Studies of anticonvulsants, antipsychotics (aripiprazole), opioid antagonists (naltrexone), varenicline and atomoxetine provided either low-strength or insufficient evidence of no effect on the outcomes of interest. Many of the studies had high or unclear risk of bias.
On the basis of low- to moderate-strength evidence, most medications evaluated for methamphetamine/amphetamine use disorder have not shown a statistically significant benefit. However, there is low-strength evidence that methylphenidate may reduce use.
甲基苯丙胺/苯丙胺(MA/A)成瘾是一个主要的公共卫生问题。目前,美国食品和药物管理局或欧洲药品管理局尚未批准任何用于治疗 MA/A 使用障碍的药物疗法。我们综述了 MA/A 使用障碍的药物治疗效果,以评估证据的质量、发表偏倚和总体强度。
系统综述和荟萃分析。我们检索了多个数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane Library),以获取截至 2019 年 4 月关于系统评价(SRs)和随机对照试验(RCTs)的信息。纳入的研究招募了患有 MA/A 使用障碍的成年人;样本量从 19 到 229 人不等。我们感兴趣的结局包括:连续 3 周或以上尿液毒品检测(UDS)呈阴性的戒断率;UDS 标本呈 MA/A 阴性的整体使用率;以及治疗保留率。一项关于 MA/A 使用障碍药物治疗的系统综述和另外 17 项 RCT 符合我们的纳入标准,涵盖了 17 种不同的药物(抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、精神兴奋剂、抗惊厥药和阿片类拮抗剂)。我们在随机效应荟萃分析中结合了具有可比性干预措施和结局测量的试验结果。我们使用标准化标准评估每个结局的质量、发表偏倚和证据强度。
有两项 RCT 提供了低强度证据,表明哌甲酯可能减少 MA/A 的使用:一项研究中 6.5%与 2.8%的 MA/A 阴性 UDS(n=34,P=0.008),另一项研究中 23%与 16%(n=54,P=0.047)。基于中等强度证据,抗抑郁药作为一类药物对戒断或保留没有统计学上的显著影响。抗惊厥药、抗精神病药(阿立哌唑)、阿片类拮抗剂(纳曲酮)、伐伦克林和托莫西汀的研究提供了对感兴趣结局无影响的低强度或证据不足的结果。许多研究的偏倚风险较高或不明确。
基于低到中等强度的证据,评估用于治疗甲基苯丙胺/苯丙胺使用障碍的大多数药物都没有显示出统计学上的显著益处。然而,有低强度的证据表明哌甲酯可能减少使用。