Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):18-28. doi: 10.1037/pas0000757. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
The predominant maladaptive trait models are now provided by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Section III, assessed by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012), and the International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision (ICD-11; assessed by the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD; Oltmanns & Widiger, 2018). However, 2 historical precedents are the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ; Livesley & Jackson, 2009) and the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1993). The current study administered the DAPP-BQ, SNAP, PiCD, and PID-5 to a sample of 323 persons with a history of mental health treatment. The results provided support for the historical precedence of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP, although also suggest that additional traits should perhaps be included in current models. The results also bear on additional ongoing issues, including (but not limited to) the bipolarity of maladaptive personality structure, the conceptualization of identity problems as a trait, and the discriminant validity of maladaptive trait models and their assessment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
现在，《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版（DSM-5）第三部分提供了主要的适应不良特质模型，这些特质通过《DSM-5 人格量表》（PID-5；Krueger、Derringer、Markon、Watson 和 Skodol，2012）和《国际疾病分类》第 11 版（ICD-11；由《ICD-11 人格量表》（PiCD；Oltmanns 和 Widiger，2018）评估。然而，有两个历史先例，即《人格病理学维度评估基础问卷》（DAPP-BQ；Livesley 和 Jackson，2009）和《非适应和适应人格量表》（SNAP；Clark，1993）。本研究向 323 名有心理健康治疗史的人发放了 DAPP-BQ、SNAP、PiCD 和 PID-5。研究结果支持 DAPP-BQ 和 SNAP 的历史先例，尽管也表明目前的模型可能需要纳入更多的特质。研究结果还涉及其他正在进行的问题，包括（但不限于）适应不良人格结构的双极性、将身份问题概念化为特质、以及适应不良特质模型及其评估的判别有效性。（APA，2019 年，所有权利保留）。
