Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science.
Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/pas0000776. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), recently approved by the World Health Organization, contains a new diagnostic approach for personality disorders. This approach partly involves the consideration of 5 dimensional trait domain qualifiers-Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissocial, Disinhibition, and Anankastia. Oltmanns and Widiger (2018) recently developed a self-report measure, the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), to assess the 5 domains; however, further examination of the psychometric properties of the PiCD is warranted due to its limited research base. The present study aimed to further examine the reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance of the PiCD in an ethnically diverse undergraduate sample (N = 518), who were also administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form. First, results suggested that the PiCD domain scales exhibited adequate internal consistency reliability via coefficient categorical omega (range = .77-.87). Next, exploratory structural equation modeling results suggested support for a 4-factor solution, with the 4th factor thought to represent a bipolar continuum of Anankastia to Disinhibition severity. Random-intercept factor analysis results suggested a small amount of variance in items (4.88%) attributable to idiosyncratic scale usage. Lastly, relations between PiCD domains and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form scales (Personality Psychopathology-5 and Higher Order scales) provided support for the validity of the Negative Affectivity, Detachment, and Dissocial domains, though relatively less support for the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains. Further examination of other psychometric properties and the nomological network of the PiCD is recommended. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
世界卫生组织最近批准的第 11 版《国际疾病分类和相关健康问题》(ICD-11)包含了一种新的人格障碍诊断方法。这种方法部分涉及到 5 个维度特质领域的考虑——负性情感、超脱、反社会、冲动和强迫。奥尔特曼斯和威德格(2018)最近开发了一种自评量表,即《人格障碍检查表 ICD-11》(PiCD),用于评估这 5 个领域;然而,由于其研究基础有限,需要进一步检查 PiCD 的心理测量特性。本研究旨在进一步检查 PiCD 在种族多样化的大学生样本(N=518)中的可靠性、结构和同时效度以及方法偏差,这些被试还接受了明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2 修订版的测试。首先,结果表明,PiCD 域量表通过系数分类 ω(范围为.77-.87)表现出足够的内部一致性可靠性。接下来,探索性结构方程模型的结果表明,支持 4 因素解决方案,第 4 个因素被认为代表了强迫到冲动严重程度的双极连续体。随机截距因子分析结果表明,项目的差异较小(4.88%),归因于独特的量表使用。最后,PiCD 域与明尼苏达多相人格问卷-2 修订版之间的关系(人格心理病理学-5 和高阶量表)为负性情感、超脱和反社会领域的有效性提供了支持,而对冲动和强迫领域的支持相对较少。建议进一步检查 PiCD 的其他心理测量特性和效标网络。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。