• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级医疗中心高危剖宫产麻醉的临床评估:8年(2009 - 2016年)回顾性研究

Clinical evaluation of anesthesia for high-risk cesarean section at a tertiary medical center: retrospective study for 8 years (2009-2016).

作者信息

Kang H W, Kim W Y, Jin S J, Kim Y H, Min T J, Lee Y S, Kim J H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4365-4373. doi: 10.1177/0300060519859749. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1177/0300060519859749
PMID:31331228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6753575/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The number of high-risk pregnancies is increasing in tertiary medical centers. Therefore, we investigated perioperative outcomes based on risk factors to ascertain proper maternal and neonatal management.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients receiving cesarean sections over an 8-year period. Clinical parameters for anesthesia and the neonatal outcome were compared among high-risk groups after subdivision by the number of clinical risk factors. The groups were as follows: group A (one risk factor), group B (two risk factors), and group C (three or more risk factors).

RESULTS

Patient age, estimated blood loss (EBL), and volume of transfused red blood cell (RBC) were higher in group B than group A. Birth weight, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, and gestational age were lower while the frequency of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission was higher in group B than group A. Group C patients were significantly older than group A or B patients. Birth weight, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores and gestational age were significantly lower while frequency of NICU admission was higher in group C than group A and B.

CONCLUSION

The number of maternal risk factors was positively associated with adverse outcomes in the neonates.

摘要

目的

三级医疗中心高危妊娠的数量正在增加。因此,我们基于风险因素调查围手术期结局,以确定适当的孕产妇和新生儿管理措施。

方法

我们回顾了8年间接受剖宫产手术患者的病历。在根据临床风险因素数量细分的高危组中,比较麻醉的临床参数和新生儿结局。分组如下:A组(一个风险因素)、B组(两个风险因素)和C组(三个或更多风险因素)。

结果

B组患者的年龄、估计失血量(EBL)和输注红细胞(RBC)的量均高于A组。B组的出生体重、1分钟和5分钟阿氏评分以及孕周均低于A组,而新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院频率高于A组。C组患者明显比A组或B组患者年龄大。C组的出生体重、1分钟和5分钟阿氏评分以及孕周明显低于A组和B组,而NICU入院频率高于A组和B组。

结论

孕产妇风险因素的数量与新生儿不良结局呈正相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea71/6753575/24dbb5b3b115/10.1177_0300060519859749-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea71/6753575/39e55f561ef1/10.1177_0300060519859749-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea71/6753575/24dbb5b3b115/10.1177_0300060519859749-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea71/6753575/39e55f561ef1/10.1177_0300060519859749-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea71/6753575/24dbb5b3b115/10.1177_0300060519859749-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of anesthesia for high-risk cesarean section at a tertiary medical center: retrospective study for 8 years (2009-2016).三级医疗中心高危剖宫产麻醉的临床评估:8年(2009 - 2016年)回顾性研究
J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4365-4373. doi: 10.1177/0300060519859749. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing cesarean section: a 10-year retrospective study from a single tertiary care center: anesthetic point of view.重度子痫前期产妇剖宫产的母儿结局:来自单一三级医疗中心的10年回顾性研究:麻醉视角
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Dec;29(24):4096-100. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1159674. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
3
A retrospective analysis of maternal complications and newborn outcomes of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a single tertiary hospital in China.中国一家三甲医院剖宫产全麻的产妇并发症及新生儿结局的回顾性分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 6;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01753-y.
4
Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.是否选择剖宫产?产妇年龄与足月时不良结局风险:一项基于人群的低风险初产妇登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3.
5
Identifying Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery in a Predominantly Hispanic Teenage Population: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.确定以西班牙裔青少年为主的人群剖宫产的危险因素:一项5年回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018 Oct;31(5):485-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery.超声胎儿头围过大与剖宫产的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):339.e1-339.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.230. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
7
Vaginal birth after cesarean section: 10 years of experience in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:台湾某三级医疗中心的10年经验
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;55(3):394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.04.016.
8
A study of factors influencing surgical cesarean delivery times in an academic tertiary center.一项关于学术性三级医疗中心影响剖宫产手术时间因素的研究。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018 May;34:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
9
[The outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section].[剖宫产术后试产的结果]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 25;51(10):748-753. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.10.008.
10
Neonatal outcome in cesarean section under general anesthesia, related to gestational age, induction-delivery and uterus-delivery intervals.全身麻醉下剖宫产的新生儿结局,与孕周、诱导分娩及子宫分娩间隔的关系。
Isr J Med Sci. 1983 Dec;19(12):1059-63.

本文引用的文献

1
High-Risk Pregnancy.高危妊娠
Nurs Clin North Am. 2018 Jun;53(2):241-251. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Special features of high-risk pregnancies as factors in development of mental distress: a review.高危妊娠作为精神困扰发展因素的特殊特征:一项综述
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2016 Jul-Sep;38(3):136-140. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2015-0067.
3
Anesthetic Considerations in the Obese Parturient.肥胖产妇的麻醉注意事项
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;59(1):193-203. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000180.
4
Individual and institutional determinants of caesarean section in referral hospitals in Senegal and Mali: a cross-sectional epidemiological survey.塞内加尔和马里转诊医院剖宫产的个体和机构决定因素:横断面流行病学调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Oct 22;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-114.
5
Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section.剖宫产的区域麻醉与全身麻醉
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.
6
Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the United States: 1979-2002.美国与麻醉相关的产妇死亡率:1979-2002 年。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;117(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820093a9.
7
General anesthesia for cesarean delivery at a tertiary care hospital from 2000 to 2005: a retrospective analysis and 10-year update.2000 年至 2005 年三级保健医院剖宫产术的全身麻醉:回顾性分析和 10 年更新。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011 Jan;20(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
8
Obstetrical management of the older gravida.高龄孕妇的产科管理
Womens Health (Lond). 2010 May;6(3):463-8. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.26.
9
Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment.肥胖及病态肥胖患者的产科麻醉:一分预防胜过十分治疗。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Jan;52(1):6-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01483.x.
10
Fetal deaths in the United States. Influence of high-risk conditions and implications for management.美国的死胎情况。高危状况的影响及管理意义。
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;100(6):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02389-x.