• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016 年柏林恐怖袭击后危机干预对急救人员心理健康状况的影响。

Impact of Crisis Intervention on the Mental Health Status of Emergency Responders Following the Berlin Terrorist Attack in 2016.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychotraumatology, Bundeswehr Hospital, Berlin, Germany.

Fire Department Berlin, Volunteer Fire Brigade Wedding, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Apr;14(2):168-172. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.60. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1017/dmp.2019.60
PMID:31331414
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The most common crisis intervention used with German rescue workers is Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM). Results regarding its effectiveness are inconsistent. A negative reinforcement of avoidance, due to premature termination of strong emotions during the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD), may explain this. The effectiveness of the CISD after terror attacks in Germany has not yet been investigated.

METHODS

All emergency responders deployed at the terror attack on Breitscheidplatz in Berlin were invited to take part in the study; 37 of the N = 55 participants had voluntarily participated in CISD; 18 had not.

RESULTS

Participants with CISD showed lower quality of life in psychological health and higher depressive symptomatology. Of these, females had lower quality of life in social relationships, whereas males showed more posttraumatic stress symptoms. Emergency responders from non-governmental organizations had higher phobic anxiety. Emergency medical technicians showed more somatic and depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSION

There is no conclusive explanation for why rescue workers with CISD score worse on certain measures. It is possible that CISD has a harmful influence due to negative reinforcement, or that there was a selection effect. Further research differentiating occupational group, sex, and type of event is necessary.

摘要

目的

德国救援人员最常采用的危机干预方法是重大事件应激晤谈(CISM)。关于其效果的结果不一致。在重大事件应激晤谈(CISD)期间,由于过早终止强烈情绪,可能会产生回避的负强化,从而导致这种情况。在德国发生恐怖袭击后,CISD 的有效性尚未得到调查。

方法

邀请部署在柏林布赖特沙伊德广场恐怖袭击事件中的所有应急响应人员参加研究;N=55 名参与者中有 37 名自愿参加了 CISD;18 名没有。

结果

接受 CISD 的参与者在心理健康和抑郁症状方面的生活质量较低。其中,女性在社会关系方面的生活质量较低,而男性则表现出更多的创伤后应激症状。非政府组织的应急响应人员表现出更高的恐惧症焦虑。急救人员表现出更多的躯体和抑郁症状。

结论

没有明确的解释为什么接受 CISD 的救援人员在某些方面的得分较低。CISD 可能由于负强化而产生有害影响,或者存在选择效应。需要进一步研究区分职业群体、性别和事件类型。

相似文献

1
Impact of Crisis Intervention on the Mental Health Status of Emergency Responders Following the Berlin Terrorist Attack in 2016.2016 年柏林恐怖袭击后危机干预对急救人员心理健康状况的影响。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Apr;14(2):168-172. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.60. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
2
Burdens on emergency responders after a terrorist attack in Berlin.柏林恐怖袭击事件后对急救人员造成的负担。
Occup Med (Lond). 2018 Feb 16;68(1):60-63. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx172.
3
Longitudinal Mental Health Effects of the 2016 Terrorist Attack in Berlin on Various Occupational Groups of Emergency Service Personnel.2016 年柏林恐怖袭击对各职业群体的应急服务人员的纵向心理健康影响。
Health Secur. 2020 Sep-Oct;18(5):403-408. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0108.
4
Group critical incident stress debriefing with emergency services personnel: a randomized controlled trial.群体危机事件后心理应激晤谈在急救人员中的应用:一项随机对照试验
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014 Jan;27(1):38-54. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2013.809421. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
5
Critical incident stress management (CISM) in support of special agents and other first responders responding to the Fort Hood shooting: summary and recommendations.支持应对胡德堡枪击案的特工及其他急救人员的危机事件应激管理(CISM):总结与建议
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2010 Summer;12(3):151-60.
6
Understanding the psychological impacts of responding to a terrorist incident.了解应对恐怖袭击事件的心理影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Nov 24;12(1):1959116. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1959116. eCollection 2021.
7
Critical incident stress management (CISM): benefit or risk for emergency services?重大事件应激管理(CISM):对紧急救援服务是益处还是风险?
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003 Apr-Jun;7(2):272-9. doi: 10.1080/10903120390936941.
8
Psychological interventions following terrorist attacks.恐怖袭击后的心理干预。
Br Med Bull. 2008;88(1):7-22. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldn041. Epub 2008 Nov 16.
9
Psychological consequences of terrorist attacks: prevalence and predictors of mental health problems in Pakistani emergency responders.恐怖袭击的心理后果:巴基斯坦应急响应人员心理健康问题的流行率和预测因素。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 May 15;207(1-2):80-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.031. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
10
A systematic review of probable posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders following man-made mass violence.人为大规模暴力事件后急救人员创伤后应激障碍的系统评价
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of crisis intervention on mental health in the context of specific civilian emergencies.特定平民紧急情况背景下危机干预对心理健康的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0331249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331249. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effectiveness of Debriefing on the Mental Health of Rescue Teams: A Systematic Review.汇报对救援团队心理健康的有效性:一项系统综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;22(4):590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040590.
3
Post-incident psychosocial interventions after a traumatic incident in the workplace: a systematic review of current research evidence and clinical guidance.
创伤性工作场所事件后的事件后心理社会干预:当前研究证据和临床指导的系统综述。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2281751. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2281751. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Investigating the impact of terrorist attacks on the mental health of emergency responders: systematic review.调查恐怖袭击对应急响应人员心理健康的影响:系统评价
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jun 3;8(4):e107. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.69.
5
Anxiety, Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Terrorist Attacks: A General Review of the Literature.恐怖袭击后的焦虑、抑郁与创伤后应激障碍:文献综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;11(10):140. doi: 10.3390/bs11100140.