Germline genome editing: public dialogue is urgent but not self-evident.
作者信息
Vijlbrief Boy, Riedijk Sam, Houtman Diewertje, Hofstra Robert
机构信息
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
出版信息
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jan;28(1):4-5. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0474-6. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Germline genome editing: public dialogue is urgent but not self-evident.生殖系基因组编辑：公众对话刻不容缓，但并非不言而喻。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jan;28(1):4-5. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0474-6. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
Germline Editing: Editors Cautionary.生殖系编辑：编辑们的警示
Clin Ter. 2018 Mar-Apr;169(2):e58-e59. doi: 10.7417/T.2018.2053.
3
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.基因的修订、修正和转移。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Aug;20(8):7-18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1783024.
4
Communicating Biotech Advances: Fiction versus Reality.交流生物技术进展：虚构与现实。
Trends Biotechnol. 2018 Feb;36(2):121-123. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Human Germline Genome Editing: An Assessment.人类生殖系基因组编辑：评估。
CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):253-265. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0038.
6
The ethics of creating genetically modified children using genome editing.使用基因组编辑技术创造转基因儿童的伦理问题。
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017 Dec;24(6):418-423. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000369.
7
Public engagement and communication: who is in charge?公众参与和沟通：由谁负责？
EMBO Rep. 2018 Jan;19(1):1-2. doi: 10.15252/embr.201745379. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
8
The Daunting Economics of Therapeutic Genome Editing.治疗性基因组编辑的艰巨经济学。
CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):280-284. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2019.0052.
9
AMA Policies and Code of Medical Ethics Opinions Related to Human Genome Editing.美国医学协会关于人类基因组编辑的政策及医学伦理意见准则
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Dec 1;21(12):E1056-1058. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1056.
10
Ethical Considerations in the Manufacture, Sale, and Distribution of Genome Editing Technologies.基因组编辑技术制造、销售和分发中的伦理考量。
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Aug;18(8):3-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1489653.
引用本文的文献
1
Gamete and embryo donation for research: what might shape the willingness to donate among gamete donors and recipients?配子和胚胎捐赠用于研究：是什么影响配子捐赠者和接受者的捐赠意愿？
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Sep;39(9):2077-2087. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02569-y. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
2
Changes in opinions about human germline gene editing as a result of the Dutch DNA-dialogue project.荷兰 DNA 对话项目导致人们对人类 germline 基因编辑的看法发生变化。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;31(4):409-416. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01114-w. Epub 2022 May 12.
本文引用的文献
1
A global observatory for gene editing.一个基因编辑全球观测站。
Nature. 2018 Mar;555(7697):435-437. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-03270-w.
2
Human germline gene editing. Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.人类生殖系基因编辑。欧洲人类遗传学学会（ESHG）和欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会（ESHRE）的建议。
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Jan 12;2018(1):hox025. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox025. eCollection 2018.
3
Wake-up call from Hong Kong.来自香港的警钟。
Science. 2018 Dec 14;362(6420):1215. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw3127.
4
Falling giants and the rise of gene editing: ethics, private interests and the public good.巨人的陨落与基因编辑的崛起：伦理、私人利益与公共利益。
Hum Genomics. 2017 Aug 29;11(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40246-017-0116-4.
5
Human Germline Genome Editing.人类种系基因组编辑
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug 3;101(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.012.
Zotero 插件