• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发综合性大一专题研习课程以评估和反馈学生学习和课程效果。

Developing a Comprehensive First-year Capstone to Assess and Inform Student Learning and Curriculum Effectiveness.

机构信息

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Associate Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Jun;83(5):6730. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6730.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe6730
PMID:31333250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6630860/
Abstract

To describe the development and implementation of an innovative, comprehensive, multi-day module focused on assessing and providing feedback on student cognitive and interpersonal skill development and practice readiness after the first year (PY1) of a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum. A multi-day capstone assessment was developed to evaluate first-year students' knowledge of course content, ability to find and apply information, and interpersonal skills, including teamwork and adaptability. The PY1 Capstone consisted of four parts. Knowledge was assessed using 130 multiple-choice items on first-year course content and 50 fill-in-the-blank items on Top 200 brand and generic drug names. The ability to find and apply information was assessed using a 45-question open-book test. Interpersonal skills were assessed using a specially designed multiple mini-interview (MMI). The final part of the assessment was a debriefing session that provided rapid-cycle feedback on capstone performance and a bridge between students' recently completed first-year coursework and an upcoming 2-month experiential immersion. The average score on the closed-book and open-book assessments were 75% and 68%, respectively. Most students displayed satisfactory interpersonal skills based on the MMI. Students viewed the assessment positively based on post-assessment survey responses (>75%). Most students (98%) reported not studying for the assessment, indicating that the results should reflect students' retention of knowledge and skills. The capstone assesses students on knowledge and skills and provides students with feedback on areas to focus on during their early immersion. Continued work is needed to ensure the process is transparent and cost-effective.

摘要

描述一个创新的、全面的、为期多日的模块的开发和实施,该模块侧重于评估和提供反馈,以了解学生在药学博士(PharmD)课程第一年(PY1)后认知和人际技能发展和实践准备情况。开发了一个为期多日的顶点评估,以评估一年级学生对课程内容的了解、查找和应用信息的能力以及包括团队合作和适应性在内的人际技能。PY1 顶点评估由四个部分组成。使用 130 道多项选择题评估第一年课程内容,使用 50 道填空题评估前 200 种品牌和通用药物名称的知识。使用 45 道开卷考试评估查找和应用信息的能力。使用专门设计的多项迷你面试(MMI)评估人际技能。评估的最后一部分是汇报会议,提供对顶点表现的快速循环反馈,并在学生最近完成的第一年课程和即将到来的为期 2 个月的体验式沉浸课程之间架起桥梁。闭卷和开卷考试的平均分数分别为 75%和 68%。大多数学生根据 MMI 展示了令人满意的人际技能。根据评估后的调查回复(超过 75%),学生对评估持积极态度。大多数学生(98%)表示没有为评估而学习,这表明结果应该反映学生对知识和技能的保留情况。该顶点评估学生的知识和技能,并为学生提供在早期沉浸期间需要关注的领域的反馈。需要继续努力确保该过程具有透明度和成本效益。

相似文献

1
Developing a Comprehensive First-year Capstone to Assess and Inform Student Learning and Curriculum Effectiveness.开发综合性大一专题研习课程以评估和反馈学生学习和课程效果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Jun;83(5):6730. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6730.
2
Measuring preadvanced practice experience outcomes as part of a PharmD capstone experience.将预先高级实践经验成果的测量作为药学博士顶点经验的一部分。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Oct 15;78(8):152. doi: 10.5688/ajpe788152.
3
A capstone advanced pharmacy practice experience in research.研究方向的高级药学实践体验项目。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Dec 15;74(10):180. doi: 10.5688/aj7410180.
4
A capstone course with a comprehensive and integrated review of the pharmacy curriculum and student assessment as a preparation for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.一门顶点课程,对药学课程和学生评估进行全面综合复习,为高级药学实践经验做准备。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):192. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810192.
5
Creating a win-win: A novel layered learning approach for assessing first-year pharmacy students' communication skills.创建双赢局面:一种评估药学一年级学生沟通技巧的新型分层学习方法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Aug;16(8):102111. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102111. Epub 2024 May 27.
6
Use of Capstone Experiences in Pharmacy Education to Synthesize and Apply Students' Knowledge and Skills.在药学教育中运用顶点体验来综合和应用学生的知识与技能。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Nov;84(11):8060. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8060. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Pharmacy Student Performance in a Capstone Course Utilizing the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process.药剂学生在利用药剂师患者护理流程的顶点课程中的表现。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7357. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7357.
8
Incorporation of an Explicit Critical-Thinking Curriculum to Improve Pharmacy Students' Critical-Thinking Skills.纳入明确的批判性思维课程以提高药学专业学生的批判性思维能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Apr 25;80(3):41. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80341.
9
Evolution of a capstone exam for third-year doctor of pharmacy students.药学专业三年级学生顶峰考试的演变。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Jun;15(6):599-606. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Implementation of a research capstone course with expanded flexibility.实施一门具有更大灵活性的研究顶点课程。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Jan;11(1):81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Capstone Experiences in Pharmacy Education to Synthesize and Apply Students' Knowledge and Skills.在药学教育中运用顶点体验来综合和应用学生的知识与技能。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Nov;84(11):8060. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8060. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
2
Feedback for Learning in Pharmacy Education: A Scoping Review.药学教育中的学习反馈:一项范围综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Apr 23;9(2):91. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9020091.
3
A Five-Minute Situational Judgment Test to Assess Empathy in First-Year Student Pharmacists.用于评估大一药学生同理心的五分钟情境判断测验。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6960. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6960.
4
Using the multiple mini interview as an assessment strategy within the first year of a health professions curriculum.在健康专业课程的第一年使用多次迷你面试作为评估策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 3;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1203-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the multiple mini interview as an assessment strategy within the first year of a health professions curriculum.在健康专业课程的第一年使用多次迷你面试作为评估策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 3;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1203-5.
2
Candidate Evaluation Using Targeted Construct Assessment in the Multiple Mini-Interview: A Multifaceted Rasch Model Analysis.在多重迷你面试中使用针对性结构评估进行候选人评估:多方面Rasch模型分析
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):68-74. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1205997. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Interdisciplinary Priorities for Dissemination, Implementation, and Improvement Science: Frameworks, Mechanics, and Measures.传播、实施与改进科学的跨学科优先事项:框架、机制与措施
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):820-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12319. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
4
Development and Assessment of the Multiple Mini-Interview in a School of Pharmacy Admissions Model.药学院招生模式中多重迷你面试的开发与评估
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):53. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79453.
5
A renaissance in pharmacy education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校药学教育的复兴。
N C Med J. 2014 Jan-Feb;75(1):48-52. doi: 10.18043/ncm.75.1.48.
6
Reliability of a minimal competency score for an annual skills mastery assessment.年度技能掌握评估最低能力分数的可靠性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Dec 16;77(10):211. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7710211.
7
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.药剂教育促进中心 2013 年教育成果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):162. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778162.
8
An assessment program using standardized clients to determine student readiness for clinical practice.使用标准化患者评估方案以确定学生是否准备好进行临床实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Feb 12;77(1):14. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77114.
9
Promotion of improvement as a science.将改进提升为一门科学。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 2;381(9864):419-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61850-9.
10
A pharmacotherapy capstone course to advance pharmacy students' clinical documentation skills.一门推进药学学生临床文件记录技能的药物治疗学顶峰课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Sep 10;76(7):134. doi: 10.5688/ajpe767134.