Brunner Julian W, Sankaré Ibrahima C, Kahn Katherine L
University of California, Los Angeles Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):820-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12319. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Much of dissemination, implementation, and improvement (DII) science is conducted by social scientists, healthcare practitioners, and biomedical researchers. While each of these groups has its own venues for sharing methods and findings, forums that bring together the diverse DII science workforce provide important opportunities for cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. In particular, such forums are uniquely positioned to foster the sharing of three important components of research. First: they allow the sharing of conceptual frameworks for DII science that focus on the use and spread of innovations. Second: they provide an opportunity to share strategies for initiating and governing DII research, including approaches for eliciting and incorporating the research priorities of patients, study participants, and healthcare practitioners, and decision-makers. Third: they allow the sharing of outcome measures well-suited to the goals of DII science, thereby helping to validate these outcomes in diverse contexts, improving the comparability of findings across settings, and elevating the study of the implementation process itself.
传播、实施与改进(DII)科学的许多工作是由社会科学家、医疗从业者和生物医学研究人员开展的。虽然这些群体各自都有分享方法和研究结果的渠道,但能汇聚不同DII科学工作者的论坛为跨学科合作与学习提供了重要契机。特别是,此类论坛在促进研究的三个重要组成部分的分享方面具有独特优势。其一:它们允许分享聚焦于创新的使用和传播的DII科学概念框架。其二:它们提供了一个分享启动和管理DII研究策略的机会,包括引出并纳入患者、研究参与者、医疗从业者及决策者的研究重点的方法。其三:它们允许分享非常适合DII科学目标的结果指标,从而有助于在不同背景下验证这些结果,提高不同环境下研究结果的可比性,并提升对实施过程本身的研究水平。