Schmitz Sigrid
Gender Studies in Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Front Sociol. 2021 Apr 27;6:651486. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.651486. eCollection 2021.
The cyborgization of brainbodies with computer hardware and software today ranges in scope from the realization of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) to visions of mind upload to silicon, the latter being targeted toward a transhuman future. Refining posthumanist concepts to formulate a posthuman perspective, and contrasting those approaches with transhumanist trajectories, I explore the intersectional dimension of realizations and visions of neuro-technological developments, which I name TechnoBrainBodies-in-Cultures. In an intersectional analysis, I investigate the embedding and legitimation of transhumanist visions brought about by neuroscientific research and neuro-technological development based on a concept of modern neurobiological determinism. The conjoined trajectories of BCI research and development and transhumanist visions perpetuate the inscription of intersectional norms, with the concomitant danger of producing discriminatory effects. This culminates in normative capacity being seen as a conflation of the abled, successful, white masculinized techno-brain with competition. My deeper analysis, however, also enables displacements within recent BCI research and development to be characterized: from ''thought-translation" to affective conditioning and from controllability to obstinacy within the BCI, going so far as to open the closed loop. These realizations challenge notions about the BCI's actor status and agency and foster questions about shifts in the corresponding subject-object relations. Based on these analyses, I look at the effects of neuro-technological and transhumanist governmentality on the question of whose lives are to be improved and whose lives should be excluded from these developments. Within the framework of political feminist materialisms, I combine the concept of posthuman with my concept of TechnoBrainBodies-in-Cultures to envision and discuss a material-discursive strategy, encompassing dimensions of affect, sociality, resistance, compassion, cultural diversity, ethnic diversity, multiple sexes/sexualities, aging, dis/abilities-in short, all of this "intersectional stuff"-as well as obstinate techno-brain agencies and contumacies foreseen in these cyborgian futures.
如今,脑体与计算机硬件和软件的融合,其范围涵盖从脑机接口(BCI)的实现到将思维上传至硅基的设想,后者旨在实现超人类的未来。我对后人文主义概念进行提炼,以形成一种后人类视角,并将这些方法与超人类主义的发展轨迹进行对比,探讨神经技术发展的实现与设想的交叉维度,我将其命名为“文化中的技术脑体”。在交叉分析中,我基于现代神经生物学决定论的概念,研究神经科学研究和神经技术发展所带来的超人类主义设想的嵌入与合法化。脑机接口研发与超人类主义设想的联合轨迹使交叉规范得以延续,随之而来的是产生歧视性影响的风险。这最终导致规范能力被视为有能力、成功、白人男性化的技术脑与竞争的混合体。然而,我更深入的分析也能够描述近期脑机接口研发中的转变:从“思维翻译”到情感调节,以及在脑机接口中从可控性到顽固性,甚至打开闭环。这些实现挑战了关于脑机接口的行为者地位和能动性的观念,并引发了关于相应主客关系转变的问题。基于这些分析,我审视神经技术和超人类主义治理对“哪些人的生活应得到改善,哪些人的生活应被排除在这些发展之外”这一问题的影响。在政治女性主义唯物主义的框架内,我将后人类概念与我的“文化中的技术脑体”概念相结合,以设想和讨论一种物质 - 话语策略,该策略涵盖情感、社会性、抵抗、同情、文化多样性、种族多样性、多种性别/性取向、衰老、残疾等维度——简而言之,所有这些“交叉因素”——以及这些赛博格未来中预见的顽固的技术脑能动性和倔强态度。