Martinez Katherine M, Rogers Mark W, Blackinton Mary T, Cheng M Samuel, Mille Marie-Laure
Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 3;10:711. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00711. eCollection 2019.
Asymmetrical sensorimotor function after stroke creates unique challenges for bipedal tasks such as walking or perturbation-induced reactive stepping. Preference for initiating steps with the less-involved (preferred) leg after a perturbation has been reported with limited information on the stepping response of the more-involved (non-preferred) leg. Understanding the capacity of both legs to respond to a perturbation would enhance the design of future treatment approaches. This pilot study investigated the difference in perturbation-induced stepping between legs in stroke participant and non-impaired controls. We hypothesized that stepping performance will be different between groups as well as between legs for post-stroke participants. Thirty-six participants (20 persons post-stroke, 16 age matched controls) were given an anterior perturbation from three stance positions: symmetrical (SS), preferred asymmetrical (PAS-70% body weight on the preferred leg), and non-preferred asymmetrical (N-PAS-70% body weight on the non-preferred leg). Kinematic and kinetic data were collected to measure anticipatory postural adjustment (APA), characteristics of the first step (onset, length, height, duration), number of steps, and velocity of the body at heel strike. Group differences were tested using the Mann-Whitney -test and differences between legs tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with an alpha level of 0.05. Stepping with the more-involved leg increased from 11.5% of trials in SS and N-PAS up to 46% in PAS stance position for participants post-stroke. Post-stroke participants had an earlier APA and always took more steps than controls to regain balance. However, differences between post-stroke and control participants were mainly found when stance position was modified. Compare to controls, steps with the preferred leg (N-PAS) were earlier and shorter (in time and length), whereas steps with the non-preferred leg (PAS) were also shorter but took longer. For post-stroke participants, step duration was longer and utilized more steps when stepping with the more-involved leg compared to the less-involved leg. Stepping with the more-involved leg can be facilitated by unweighting the leg. The differences between groups, and legs in post-stroke participants illustrate the simultaneous bipedal role (support and stepping) both legs have in reactive stepping and should be considered for reactive balance training.
中风后不对称的感觉运动功能给双足任务(如行走或扰动诱发的反应性迈步)带来了独特挑战。据报道,在受到扰动后,人们更倾向于用受累较轻(优势)的腿开始迈步,而关于受累较重(非优势)腿的迈步反应的信息有限。了解双腿对扰动的反应能力将有助于改进未来治疗方法的设计。这项初步研究调查了中风患者与未受损对照组在扰动诱发迈步方面双腿的差异。我们假设,中风后参与者在组间以及双腿之间的迈步表现会有所不同。36名参与者(20名中风后患者,16名年龄匹配的对照组)在三种站立姿势下接受向前的扰动:对称姿势(SS)、优势不对称姿势(PAS——70%的体重落在优势腿上)和非优势不对称姿势(N-PAS——70%的体重落在非优势腿上)。收集运动学和动力学数据,以测量预期姿势调整(APA)、第一步的特征(起始、长度、高度、持续时间)、步数以及足跟触地时身体的速度。使用曼-惠特尼检验来检验组间差异,使用威尔科克森符号秩检验来检验双腿之间的差异,显著性水平为0.05。对于中风后参与者,在SS和N-PAS姿势下,用受累较重的腿迈步的试验比例从11.5%增加到PAS姿势下的46%。中风后参与者的APA更早,并且为恢复平衡总是比对照组迈更多的步。然而,中风后参与者与对照组之间的差异主要在改变站立姿势时出现。与对照组相比,优势腿(N-PAS)的迈步更早且更短(在时间和长度上),而非优势腿(PAS)的迈步也更短但用时更长。对于中风后参与者,与受累较轻的腿相比,用受累较重的腿迈步时,步长持续时间更长且使用的步数更多。减轻受累较重腿的重量可以促进其迈步。中风后参与者组间以及双腿之间的差异表明,双腿在反应性迈步中同时发挥双足作用(支撑和迈步),在反应性平衡训练中应予以考虑。