Nkamwesiga Joseph, Coffin-Schmitt Jeanne, Ochwo Sylvester, Mwiine Frank Norbert, Palopoli Annabella, Ndekezi Christian, Isingoma Emmanuel, Nantima Noelina, Nsamba Peninah, Adiba Rogers, Hendrickx Saskia, Mariner Jeffrey C
College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, Grafton, MA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jul 5;6:221. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00221. eCollection 2019.
This paper describes an assessment of the patterns of virus circulation in the Karamoja subregion of Uganda conducted to identify the communities that maintain the virus and inform the development of a targeted vaccination strategy. Participatory epidemiological methods were used to develop an operational hypothesis for the patterns of PPR in Karamoja that was subsequently validated through outbreak investigation and genomics. The participatory epidemiological assessment included risk mapping with livestock owners, community animal health workers and veterinarians and indicated there were two critical foci of virus transmission on the Uganda-Kenya border. One was located in two adjacent subcounties of Kotido and Kaabong Districts in northern Karamoja and the other in Loroo subcounty of Amudat District in southern Karamoja. Participants reported that these were locations where outbreaks were usually first observed in Karamoja and subsequently spread to other areas. Following the participatory assessment, surveillance activities were implemented across the Karamoja subregion in 2018. Three outbreak were detected, investigated and sampled. Two outbreaks were located in the northern and one on the southern focus of transmission. No Outbreaks were diagnosed in Karamoja outside of these foci during 2018. Genomics indicated different clusters of viruses were associated with the northern and southern foci that were more closely related to other East African isolates than to each other. This indicates these are two separate systems of virus circulation which should be explicitly addressed in eradication as separate cross-border systems that require integrated cross-border interventions.
本文描述了对乌干达卡拉莫贾次区域病毒传播模式的评估,该评估旨在确定维持病毒传播的社区,并为制定有针对性的疫苗接种策略提供信息。采用参与式流行病学方法,针对卡拉莫贾地区牛瘟的传播模式提出了一个操作假设,随后通过疫情调查和基因组学进行了验证。参与式流行病学评估包括与牲畜养殖户、社区动物卫生工作者和兽医开展风险绘图,结果表明在乌干达-肯尼亚边境存在两个关键的病毒传播疫源地。一个位于卡拉莫贾北部科蒂多县和卡邦县相邻的两个次县,另一个位于卡拉莫贾南部阿穆达特县的洛罗次县。参与者报告称,这些地点通常是卡拉莫贾地区首次观察到疫情暴发的地方,随后疫情蔓延到其他地区。参与式评估之后,2018年在卡拉莫贾次区域开展了监测活动。检测、调查并采集了3起疫情的样本。其中两起疫情位于北部传播疫源地,一起位于南部传播疫源地。2018年,在这些疫源地之外的卡拉莫贾地区未诊断出疫情。基因组学研究表明,与北部和南部疫源地相关的病毒属于不同的聚类,它们与其他东非分离株的关系比彼此之间的关系更为密切。这表明存在两个独立的病毒传播系统,在根除计划中应将其作为需要跨境综合干预的独立跨境系统加以明确应对。