Cardiovascular Interventions Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
EuroIntervention. 2019 Oct 4;15(9):e749-e756. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00455.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a horizontal aorta (HA) on device success and short-term clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
We retrospectively assessed 547 consecutive patients treated with transfemoral second-generation non-balloon-expandable (NBE) (n=447) and balloon-expandable (BE) (n=100) TAVI for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Aortic angulation (AA) was evaluated with preprocedural computed tomography. Patients were dichotomised according to a previously established AA cut-point: HA group (AA ≥48°, n=230) and normal aorta (NA) group (AA <48°, n=317). Endpoints were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. Fluoroscopy time (32.8±16.4 vs 30.3±13.9 minutes, p=0.060) and radiation dose (kerma area product 120.8±99.7 vs 103.7±81.1 Gy·cm2, p=0.033) were higher in the HA group as compared to the NA group. No difference in device success was observed between patients with and without an HA (88.3% vs 88.0%, p=0.929). No differences in device success and 30-day outcomes were observed when comparing HA and NA patients, according to BE and NBE prostheses.
The presence of an HA has no impact on device success and short-term clinical outcomes of TAVI with either second-generation NBE or BE devices.
本研究旨在评估水平主动脉(HA)对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)的装置成功率和短期临床结果的影响。
我们回顾性评估了 547 例接受经股第二代非球囊扩张型(NBE)(n=447)和球囊扩张型(BE)(n=100)TAVI 治疗的症状性严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者。使用术前计算机断层扫描评估主动脉角度(AA)。根据预先确定的 AA 切点将患者分为两组:HA 组(AA≥48°,n=230)和正常主动脉(NA)组(AA<48°,n=317)。终点根据 Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 定义进行考虑。与 NA 组相比,HA 组的透视时间(32.8±16.4 与 30.3±13.9 分钟,p=0.060)和辐射剂量(比释动能面积乘积 120.8±99.7 与 103.7±81.1 Gy·cm2,p=0.033)更高。HA 组和 NA 组患者的装置成功率无差异(88.3%与 88.0%,p=0.929)。在比较 BE 和 NBE 假体时,HA 和 NA 患者之间在装置成功率和 30 天结果方面无差异。
HA 的存在对第二代 NBE 或 BE 装置的 TAVI 的装置成功率和短期临床结果没有影响。