Suppr超能文献

韩国腹膜透析使用率变化的预算影响分析。

Budget Impact Analysis of the Change in Peritoneal Dialysis Use Rate in Korea.

机构信息

National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2019 Nov-Dec;39(6):547-552. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2018.00037. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

Abstract

While the number of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has decreased by 14.4% from 2006 to 2016, the number of hemodialysis (HD) patients has sharply increased, by 237.2%, in the same period, leading to an increase in the total medical cost. We analyzed the effects of the changes in PD use rates for dialysis patients in Korea on the healthcare budget using budget impact analysis (BIA).The analysis modeled the influence of the increase in dialysis for the target population, changes in modality use rate, and/or changes in costs per patient-year on total medical cost for patients on dialysis, using the National Health Insurance Service (NHI) claims data. We developed 8 scenarios according to the changing PD use rate.In scenarios 1 - 4 (increase in PD patients by 6%, 13%, 20%, and 50% of non-diabetic prevalent HD patients under 65), 5-year budget savings ranged from $47 million to $394 million (0.9% - 7.3% of the end-stage renal disease [ESRD] budget). In scenarios 5 - 8 (increase in incident PD patients by 20%, 50%, 70%, and 100% of non-diabetic patients under 65), 5-year savings ranged from $25 million to $74 million (0.5% - 1.4% of the ESRD budget). In all scenarios, budget savings were higher as PD patients increased, showing a gradually growing trend.In all scenarios from the payer's perspective, savings could be achieved through an increase in PD use. Selecting PD for ESRD patients without different expected clinical outcomes between HD and PD would be beneficial to the NHI budget.

摘要

虽然 2006 年至 2016 年腹膜透析 (PD) 患者数量减少了 14.4%,同期血液透析 (HD) 患者数量却急剧增加了 237.2%,导致总医疗费用增加。我们使用预算影响分析 (BIA) 分析了韩国 PD 使用率变化对医疗保健预算的影响。该分析使用国家健康保险服务 (NHIS) 理赔数据,针对目标人群的透析增加、治疗模式使用率变化和/或每位患者每年的成本变化对透析患者的总医疗费用的影响建立模型。根据 PD 使用率的变化,我们制定了 8 种方案。在方案 1-4(6%、13%、20%和 50%的非糖尿病老年 65 岁以下流行 HD 患者增加 PD 患者)中,5 年预算节省范围为 4700 万美元至 3.94 亿美元(占终末期肾病 [ESRD] 预算的 0.9%-7.3%)。在方案 5-8(非糖尿病老年 65 岁以下患者的新 PD 患者增加 20%、50%、70%和 100%)中,5 年节省范围为 2500 万美元至 7400 万美元(占 ESRD 预算的 0.5%-1.4%)。在所有方案中,随着 PD 患者的增加,预算节省幅度越高,呈现出逐渐增长的趋势。从支付方的角度来看,所有方案都可以通过增加 PD 使用率来节省预算。为 ESRD 患者选择 PD 治疗,而不考虑 HD 和 PD 之间的预期临床结果差异,将有利于 NHIS 预算。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验