Suppr超能文献

分子工具是在厘清还是在混淆我们对野生动物中食源性病原体对公共卫生威胁的理解?

Are molecular tools clarifying or confusing our understanding of the public health threat from zoonotic enteric protozoa in wildlife?

作者信息

Robertson Lucy J, Clark C Graham, Debenham John J, Dubey J P, Kváč Martin, Li Junqiang, Ponce-Gordo Francisco, Ryan Una, Schares Gereon, Su Chunlei, Tsaousis Anastasios D

机构信息

Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, PO Box 369 Sentrum, 0102, Oslo, Norway.

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019 Feb 13;9:323-341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.01.010. eCollection 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases are frequently zoonotic, often originating in wildlife, but enteric protozoa are considered relatively minor contributors. Opinions regarding whether pathogenic enteric protozoa may be transmitted between wildlife and humans have been shaped by our investigation tools, and have led to oscillations regarding whether particular species are zoonotic or have host-adapted life cycles. When the only approach for identifying enteric protozoa was morphology, it was assumed that many enteric protozoa colonized multiple hosts and were probably zoonotic. When molecular tools revealed genetic differences in morphologically identical species colonizing humans and other animals, host specificity seemed more likely. Parasites from animals found to be genetically identical - at the few genes investigated - to morphologically indistinguishable parasites from human hosts, were described as having zoonotic potential. More discriminatory molecular tools have now sub-divided some protozoa again. Meanwhile, some infection events indicate that, circumstances permitting, some "host-specific" protozoa, can actually infect various hosts. These repeated changes in our understanding are linked intrinsically to the investigative tools available. Here we review how molecular tools have assisted, or sometimes confused, our understanding of the public health threat from nine enteric protozoa and example wildlife hosts ( - wild boar; sp. - wild rodents; spp. - wild fish; spp. - wild birds; spp. - non-human primates; - wild cervids; - red foxes; - snakes; - bobcats). Molecular tools have provided evidence that some enteric protozoa in wildlife may infect humans, but due to limited discriminatory power, often only the zoonotic potential of the parasite is indicated. Molecular analyses, which should be as discriminatory as possible, are one, but not the only, component of the toolbox for investigating potential public health impacts from pathogenic enteric protozoa in wildlife.

摘要

新发传染病通常是人畜共患病,往往起源于野生动物,但肠道原生动物被认为是相对较小的致病因素。关于致病性肠道原生动物是否可能在野生动物和人类之间传播的观点,受到我们调查工具的影响,导致对于特定物种是否为人畜共患病或具有宿主适应性生命周期的看法出现波动。当识别肠道原生动物的唯一方法是形态学方法时,人们认为许多肠道原生动物寄生于多种宿主,很可能是人畜共患病原体。当分子工具揭示在人类和其他动物中定殖的形态相同的物种存在基因差异时,宿主特异性似乎更有可能。在少数所研究的基因上,发现来自动物的寄生虫与来自人类宿主的形态上无法区分的寄生虫在基因上相同,这些寄生虫被描述为具有人畜共患病潜力。现在,更具区分性的分子工具再次将一些原生动物进行了细分。与此同时,一些感染事件表明,在条件允许的情况下,一些“宿主特异性”原生动物实际上可以感染各种宿主。我们对这些病原体的认识不断反复变化,本质上与现有的调查工具有关。在这里,我们回顾分子工具如何帮助我们理解,有时也会混淆我们对9种肠道原生动物以及作为示例的野生动物宿主(野猪; 属 - 野生啮齿动物; 属 - 野生鱼类; 属 - 野生鸟类; 属 - 非人灵长类动物; 鹿科 - 野生鹿类; 赤狐属 - 赤狐; 蛇亚目 - 蛇类; 山猫属 - 山猫)对公共卫生构成的威胁的理解。分子工具已提供证据表明,野生动物中的一些肠道原生动物可能感染人类,但由于区分能力有限,通常仅表明了寄生虫的人畜共患病潜力。分子分析应尽可能具有区分性,是调查野生动物致病性肠道原生动物对公共卫生潜在影响的工具包中的一个组成部分,但不是唯一组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c12e/6626983/950959cc9b6d/fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验