Department of Swedish Language and Multilingualism, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220136. eCollection 2019.
In this article, patient activity in 8 audio recorded specialist consultations on fetal cardiology is investigated in order to explore how, why and when patients tend to participate in encounters in which the doctor dominates the interaction. The overall question is: How can the participation of patients in the consultations be connected to the development of higher levels of health literacy, i.e. to interactive literacy and to critical literacy? Patient participation is here understood as interactive action and is analyzed in terms of different interactive moves, which are related to different recurring topics. Despite the highly standardized format of the consultations, there is a large variation between the patients' participation: between 0.7 and 2.8 moves per minute. The patients participate most during the topics 'Prevalence' and 'Consultations' and least during the topic 'The normal heart'. Although most of the patients' moves are responses to what the doctor says, they remarkably often pose questions and use so called rejoinders. By posing questions, they take control of the information flow and sometimes even change the topics. By using rejoinders, they analyze the problems involved in the discussion e.g. by asking for clarifications or confirmation. Patients with a low over-all participation rate also use fewer moves that indicate higher literacy levels. The qualitative analysis problematizes the idea of a simple scale from basic literacy to critical literacy. Moves that indicate basic literacy skills are interactively important for the learning activity, led by the doctor. However, patients who mainly support the doctor's initiatives don't take the opportunity to influence the flow of information in ways that might favor their health literacy development.
本文调查了 8 段记录在案的胎儿心脏病学专家咨询音频中患者的活动情况,以探索患者在何种情况下、为何种原因以及如何倾向于参与主导型医患互动。总体问题是:患者在咨询中的参与如何与更高层次的健康素养(即互动素养和批判素养)的发展相关联?在这里,患者参与被理解为互动行为,并根据不同的互动动作进行分析,这些动作与不同的反复出现的主题相关。尽管咨询具有高度标准化的格式,但患者的参与程度存在很大差异:每分钟的互动动作在 0.7 到 2.8 次之间。患者在“患病率”和“咨询”这两个主题上的参与度最高,而在“正常心脏”这个主题上的参与度最低。尽管大多数患者的动作是对医生所说内容的回应,但他们却非常频繁地提出问题并使用所谓的反驳。通过提问,他们控制了信息流,有时甚至改变了主题。通过使用反驳,他们分析了讨论中涉及的问题,例如要求澄清或确认。总体参与度较低的患者使用的表示更高文化素养水平的动作也较少。定性分析对从基础文化素养到批判文化素养的简单量表的概念提出了质疑。表示基础文化素养技能的动作对于以医生为主导的学习活动具有互动重要性。然而,主要支持医生举措的患者并没有利用这一机会以有利于他们的健康素养发展的方式影响信息流动。