• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何终止受害者的痛苦?反欺凌计划对内化症状的间接影响。

How to Stop Victims' Suffering? Indirect Effects of an Anti-Bullying Program on Internalizing Symptoms.

机构信息

Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, Via San Salvi 12, Padiglione 26, 50135 Firenze, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 23;16(14):2631. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142631.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16142631
PMID:31340598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6678412/
Abstract

Victims of bullying and cyberbullying present internalizing problems, such as anxiety, psychosomatic and depressive symptoms, and are at higher risk of considering or attempting suicide. Researchers have put great effort into developing interventions able to stop bullying and cyberbullying, and thus buffering possible negative consequences. Despite this, only a few of them have investigated the effects of these programs on the psychological suffering of the victims. The NoTrap! program is an Italian evidence-based intervention able to reduce victimization, bullying, cybervictimization and cyberbullying. The aim of the present study is to analyze whether the NoTrap! program can reduce internalizing symptoms through the decrease in both victimization and cybervictimization. Participants were 622 adolescents, enrolled in the 9th grade of eight high schools in Tuscany (experimental group: = 451; control group: = 171). We collected data at three time points: pre-, mid- and post-intervention. Using latent growth curve models, we found that the program significantly predicted the change in internalizing symptoms over time. Furthermore, the mediation model showed that only the indirect effect via cybervictimization was significant. In summary, the program reduced internalizing symptoms within the experimental group successfully, through the decrease in cybervictimization more so than through the mediational effect of decreasing victimization.

摘要

受欺凌和网络欺凌的受害者会出现内化问题,如焦虑、身心症状和抑郁症状,并且更有可能考虑或尝试自杀。研究人员已经投入大量精力开发能够阻止欺凌和网络欺凌的干预措施,从而缓冲可能的负面后果。尽管如此,只有少数研究调查了这些项目对受害者心理痛苦的影响。NoTrap! 计划是一个基于意大利证据的干预计划,能够减少受害、欺凌、网络受害和网络欺凌。本研究的目的是分析 NoTrap! 计划是否可以通过减少受害和网络受害来减轻内化症状。参与者为 622 名青少年,他们在托斯卡纳的八所高中的 9 年级入学(实验组:n=451;对照组:n=171)。我们在三个时间点收集数据:干预前、干预中和干预后。使用潜在增长曲线模型,我们发现该计划显著预测了内化症状随时间的变化。此外,中介模型表明,只有通过网络受害的间接效应才具有统计学意义。总之,该计划通过减少网络受害,成功地降低了实验组的内化症状,而不是通过减少受害的中介效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/accb/6678412/5cef6586e965/ijerph-16-02631-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/accb/6678412/ee441bbd8844/ijerph-16-02631-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/accb/6678412/5cef6586e965/ijerph-16-02631-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/accb/6678412/ee441bbd8844/ijerph-16-02631-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/accb/6678412/5cef6586e965/ijerph-16-02631-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How to Stop Victims' Suffering? Indirect Effects of an Anti-Bullying Program on Internalizing Symptoms.如何终止受害者的痛苦?反欺凌计划对内化症状的间接影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 23;16(14):2631. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142631.
2
Does cyberbullying predict internalizing problems and conduct problems when controlled for traditional bullying?当控制了传统欺凌行为后,网络欺凌是否会预测内化问题和行为问题?
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Apr;61(2):307-311. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12601. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials.基于证据的反欺凌和网络欺凌干预措施:对NoTrap! 项目在两项独立试验中的评估。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):194-206. doi: 10.1002/ab.21636.
4
Victimization by traditional bullying and cyberbullying and the combination of these among adolescents in 13 European and Asian countries.青少年在 13 个欧洲和亚洲国家中遭受传统欺凌和网络欺凌以及两者结合的情况。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;31(9):1391-1404. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01779-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finnish youth.KiVa 反欺凌计划对芬兰青少年网络欺凌和网络受欺凌频率的影响。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(6):820-33. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.787623. Epub 2013 May 9.
6
Traditional and cyberbullying co-occurrence and its relationship to psychiatric symptoms.传统欺凌与网络欺凌的共现情况及其与精神症状的关系。
Pediatr Int. 2017 Jan;59(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/ped.13067. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
7
Profiles of internalizing and externalizing symptoms associated with bullying victimization.与受欺凌有关的内化和外化症状特征。
J Adolesc. 2018 Jun;65:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
8
Bullying Victimization and Problem Video Gaming: The Mediating Role of Externalizing and Internalizing Problems.受欺凌经历与问题性电子游戏行为:外化和内化问题的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):1930. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041930.
9
A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems.传统受害经历与网络受害经历与内化问题的差异关系的元分析。
Aggress Behav. 2018 Mar;44(2):185-198. doi: 10.1002/ab.21742. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
Longitudinal associations between traditional and cyberbullying victimization and depressive symptoms among young Chinese: A mediation analysis.传统和网络欺凌受害与中国青少年抑郁症状的纵向关联:中介分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Jun;140:106141. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106141. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Relationship between Aggressive Behavior and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury among Adolescent Boys and Girls: The Mediating Role of Peer Victimization.青少年男孩和女孩攻击行为与非自杀性自伤之间的纵向关系:同伴受害的中介作用
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02149-0.
2
Profiles and Transitions of Loneliness and Depressive Symptoms among Migrant Children: Predictive Role of Bullying Victimization.流动人口儿童孤独感和抑郁症状的特征和转变:受欺凌的预测作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2606-2619. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01847-x. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Family and Educational Strategies for Cyberbullying Prevention: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges and Opportunities of Anti-Bullying Intervention Programs.反欺凌干预计划的挑战与机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 22;16(10):1810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101810.
2
Is bullying and teasing associated with eating disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis.欺凌和戏弄是否与饮食失调有关?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2019 May;52(5):497-514. doi: 10.1002/eat.23035. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Self-Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People: Systematic Review.儿童和青少年的自我伤害、自杀行为及网络欺凌:系统评价
家庭和教育策略预防网络欺凌:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 22;19(16):10452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610452.
4
Research Review: Do antibullying interventions reduce internalizing symptoms? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression exploring intervention components, moderators, and mechanisms.研究综述:反欺凌干预措施是否能减少内化症状?一项系统综述、荟萃分析和元回归研究,探讨了干预措施的组成部分、调节因素和作用机制。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;63(12):1454-1465. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13620. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Cybervictimization, and Academic Performance in Secondary School Students.中学生情绪智力、网络受害与学业成绩的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217717.
6
Cyberbullying Victimization and Adolescent Depression: The Mediating Role of Psychological Security and the Moderating Role of Growth Mindset.网络欺凌受害与青少年抑郁:心理安全感的中介作用和成长型思维模式的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124368.
7
Child Victimization in the Context of Family Violence.儿童在家庭暴力背景下受到的伤害。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 24;16(19):3569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193569.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 19;20(4):e129. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9044.
4
Peer victimization and suicidal ideation: The role of gender and depression in a school-based sample.同伴侵害与自杀意念:基于学校样本的性别和抑郁的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Apr;67:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems.传统受害经历与网络受害经历与内化问题的差异关系的元分析。
Aggress Behav. 2018 Mar;44(2):185-198. doi: 10.1002/ab.21742. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
Concurrent and Longitudinal Contribution of Exposure to Bullying in Childhood to Mental Health: The Role of Vulnerability and Resilience.童年期遭受欺凌对心理健康的同期和纵向影响:脆弱性与复原力的作用。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1112-1119. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2678.
7
Perceived Severity of Cyberbullying: Differences and Similarities across Four Countries.网络欺凌的感知严重程度:四个国家之间的差异与相似之处。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01524. eCollection 2017.
8
Peer Cybervictimization Among Adolescents and the Associated Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Meta-Analysis.青少年之间的同伴网络受害经历及其相关的内化和外化问题:一项元分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Sep;45(9):1727-43. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0541-z. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! program in two independent trials.基于证据的反欺凌和网络欺凌干预措施:对NoTrap! 项目在两项独立试验中的评估。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):194-206. doi: 10.1002/ab.21636.
10
Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for risk × intervention effects.校园欺凌预防计划能否改善受害者的困境?风险×干预效果的证据。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):334-44. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000078. Epub 2016 Jan 21.