Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 24;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1012-4.
The concept of intersectionality has gradually been introduced to health inequality research, adding depth and breadth to the way inequalities in health are approached. We conducted a scoping review with the purpose to systematically map, describe and analyze the literature about intersectional inequalities in mental health. For eligibility, the study had to analyze and report inequality defined by combinations of socioeconomic position, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation or religion. The mental health outcome had to be measured as self-reported symptoms assessed through validated scales, or disorders assessed through diagnostic interviews. The search strategy was applied in two databases and the screening process yielded 20 studies. The interaction of intersectional positions showed no consistent patterns in mental health across studies, but both synergistic and antagonistic effects were observed. In most studies an absolute measure of inequality was used and few studies analyzed factors potentially explaining the intersectional inequalities. Taken together, the findings of this review highlight the value of assessing intersectional inequalities across population groups for priority setting and action on mental health inequalities.
交叉性的概念逐渐被引入健康不平等研究领域,为研究健康不平等问题提供了更深入和广泛的视角。我们进行了一项范围综述,旨在系统地绘制、描述和分析关于心理健康交叉不平等的文献。研究必须分析和报告由社会经济地位、性别、种族/民族、性取向或宗教等组合定义的不平等。心理健康结果必须通过经过验证的量表评估的自我报告症状或通过诊断访谈评估的障碍来衡量。该搜索策略应用于两个数据库,筛选过程产生了 20 项研究。在大多数研究中,使用了绝对不平等衡量标准,很少有研究分析潜在解释交叉不平等的因素。总的来说,本综述的研究结果强调了在优先考虑和采取行动解决心理健康不平等问题时,对不同人群的交叉不平等进行评估的价值。