Department of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Syggrou 356, 17674, Kallithea, Greece.
Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, 26500, Rio, Greece.
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Jul 25;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0318-2.
A recent study raised concerns about e-cigarette liquids toxicity by reporting the presence of 14 flavouring chemicals with toxicity classification. However, the relevant toxicity classification was not estimated according to the measured concentrations. The purpose of this study was to calculate the toxicity classification for different health hazards for all the flavouring chemicals at the maximum concentrations reported.
The analysis was based on the European Union Classification Labelling and Packaging regulation. The concentration of each flavouring chemical was compared with the minimum concentration needed to classify it as toxic. Additionally, toxicity classification was examined for a theoretical e-cigarette liquid containing all flavouring chemicals at the maximum concentrations reported.
There was at least one toxicity classification for all the flavouring chemicals, with the most prevalent classifications related to skin, oral, eye and respiratory toxicities. One chemical (methyl cyclopentenolone) was found at a maximum concentration 150.7% higher than that needed to be classified as toxic. For the rest, the maximum reported concentrations were 71.6 to > 99.9% lower than toxicity concentrations. A liquid containing all flavouring compounds at the maximum concentrations would be classified as toxic for one category only due to the presence of methyl cyclopentenolone; a liquid without methyl cyclopentenolone would have 66.7 to > 99.9% lower concentrations of flavourings than those needed to be classified as toxic.
The vast majority of flavouring compounds in e-cigarette liquids as reported in a recent study were present at levels far lower than needed to classify them as toxic. Since exceptions exist, regulatory monitoring of liquid composition is warranted.
最近的一项研究报告称,电子烟液中存在 14 种具有毒性分类的调味化学品,这引发了人们对电子烟液毒性的担忧。然而,相关毒性分类并不是根据测量浓度来估计的。本研究的目的是根据欧盟分类、标签和包装法规,计算报告的最大浓度下所有调味化学品的不同健康危害的毒性分类。
该分析基于欧盟分类、标签和包装法规。将每种调味化学品的浓度与将其分类为有毒所需的最低浓度进行比较。此外,还检查了在报告的最大浓度下含有所有调味化学品的理论电子烟液的毒性分类。
所有调味化学品至少有一种毒性分类,最常见的分类与皮肤、口腔、眼睛和呼吸道毒性有关。一种化学物质(甲基环戊烯酮)的最大浓度比需要分类为有毒的浓度高 150.7%。对于其余的,报告的最大浓度比毒性浓度低 71.6%至>99.9%。由于甲基环戊烯酮的存在,含有所有调味化合物的最大浓度的液体仅被归类为有毒物质的一个类别;不含甲基环戊烯酮的液体的调味化合物浓度比需要分类为有毒物质的浓度低 66.7%至>99.9%。
在最近的一项研究中报告的电子烟液中的绝大多数调味化合物的浓度远低于将其分类为有毒物质所需的浓度。由于存在例外情况,有必要对液体成分进行监管监测。