Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1273-1285. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30395-X. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We updated the analysis to investigate patterns of recurrence and did a post-hoc survival analysis.
In the multicentre randomised phase 3 PORTEC-3 trial, women with high-risk endometrial cancer were eligible if they had International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I, endometrioid grade 3 cancer with deep myometrial invasion or lymphovascular space invasion, or both; stage II or III disease; or stage I-III disease with serous or clear cell histology; were aged 18 years and older; and had a WHO performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m given intravenously during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m given intravenously), by use of a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints of vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were analysed according to the first site of recurrence. Survival endpoints were analysed by intention-to-treat, and adjusted for stratification factors. Competing risk methods were used for failure-free survival and recurrence. We did a post-hoc analysis to analyse patterns of recurrence with 1 additional year of follow-up. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013; follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138.
Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were enrolled, of whom 660 were eligible and evaluable (330 in the chemoradiotherapy group, and 330 in the radiotherapy-alone group). At a median follow-up of 72·6 months (IQR 59·9-85·6), 5-year overall survival was 81·4% (95% CI 77·2-85·8) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·1% (71·6-80·9) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·51-0·97], p=0·034), and 5-year failure-free survival was 76·5% (95% CI 71·5-80·7) versus 69·1% (63·8-73·8; HR 0·70 [0·52-0·94], p=0·016). Distant metastases were the first site of recurrence in most patients with a relapse, occurring in 78 of 330 women (5-year probability 21·4%; 95% CI 17·3-26·3) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 98 of 330 (5-year probability 29·1%; 24·4-34·3) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·55-0·99]; p=0·047). Isolated vaginal recurrence was the first site of recurrence in one patient (0·3%; 95% CI 0·0-2·1) in both groups (HR 0·99 [95% CI 0·06-15·90]; p=0·99), and isolated pelvic recurrence was the first site of recurrence in three women (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus four (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·17-3·33]; p=0·71). At 5 years, only one grade 4 adverse event (ileus or obstruction) was reported (in the chemoradiotherapy group). At 5 years, reported grade 3 adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, occurring in 16 (8%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus ten (5%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·24). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (in four [2%] women in both groups). At 5 years, grade 2 or worse adverse events were reported in 76 (38%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 43 (23%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·002). Sensory neuropathy persisted more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone, with 5-year rates of grade 2 or worse neuropathy of 6% (13 of 201 women) versus 0% (0 of 187). No treatment-related deaths were reported.
This updated analysis shows significantly improved overall survival and failure-free survival with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. This treatment schedule should be discussed and recommended, especially for women with stage III or serous cancers, or both, as part of shared decision making between doctors and patients. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate long-term survival.
Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.
PORTEC-3 试验研究了高危子宫内膜癌患者联合辅助化疗和放疗与单纯盆腔放疗相比的获益。我们更新了分析以调查复发模式,并进行了事后生存分析。
在多中心随机 3 期 PORTEC-3 试验中,具有以下特征的高危子宫内膜癌患者有资格入组:国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)2009 分期 I 期、子宫内膜样癌 3 级伴深部肌层浸润或脉管间隙浸润,或两者兼有;II 期或 III 期疾病;或 I-III 期疾病伴浆液性或透明细胞组织学;年龄 18 岁及以上;以及 WHO 体能状态 0-2 分。参与者按 1:1 随机分配(使用有偏硬币最小化程序,按参与中心、淋巴结切除术、分期和组织学类型进行分层)接受单纯放疗(5 天/周给予 48.6 Gy 的 1.8 Gy 分数)或放化疗(在放疗期间给予两个周期顺铂 50 mg/m2 静脉注射,然后给予卡铂 AUC5 和紫杉醇 175 mg/m2 静脉注射四个周期)。主要终点是总生存和无失败生存。根据首次复发部位分析阴道、盆腔和远处复发的次要终点。通过意向治疗分析生存终点,并根据分层因素进行调整。无失败生存和复发采用竞争风险方法分析。我们进行了事后分析,以在额外随访 1 年后分析复发模式。该研究于 2013 年 12 月 20 日结束;随访仍在进行中。这项研究在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 ISRCTN83720274,在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00411138。
2006 年 11 月 23 日至 2013 年 12 月 20 日期间,共纳入 686 名女性,其中 660 名符合入组条件并可评估(放化疗组 330 名,单纯放疗组 330 名)。中位随访 72.6 个月(IQR 59.9-85.6)时,放化疗组 5 年总生存率为 81.4%(95%CI 77.2-85.8),单纯放疗组为 76.1%(71.6-80.9)(调整后的风险比[HR]0.70 [95%CI 0.51-0.97],p=0.034),5 年无失败生存率为 76.5%(95%CI 71.5-80.7),单纯放疗组为 69.1%(63.8-73.8)(HR 0.70 [0.52-0.94],p=0.016)。大多数复发患者的首次复发部位为远处转移,放化疗组 330 名患者中有 78 名(5 年概率 21.4%;95%CI 17.3-26.3),单纯放疗组 330 名患者中有 98 名(5 年概率 29.1%;24.4-34.3)(HR 0.74 [95%CI 0.55-0.99];p=0.047)。两组均有 1 例(0.3%;95%CI 0.0-2.1)首次出现孤立性阴道复发(HR 0.99 [95%CI 0.06-15.90];p=0.99),放化疗组 3 例(0.9%;95%CI 0.3-2.8)和单纯放疗组 4 例(0.9%;95%CI 0.3-2.8)首次出现孤立性盆腔复发(HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.17-3.33];p=0.71)。5 年内仅报告 1 例(0.3%)四级不良事件(肠梗阻或梗阻)。5 年后,两组间报告的 3 级不良事件无显著差异,放化疗组 201 名女性中有 16 名(8%)发生,单纯放疗组 187 名女性中有 10 名(5%)发生(p=0.24)。最常见的 3 级不良事件是高血压(两组各有 2%的女性发生)。5 年后,放化疗组 201 名女性中有 76 名(38%)和单纯放疗组 187 名女性中有 43 名(23%)报告有 2 级或更严重的不良事件(p=0.002)。报告了 5 级或更严重的感觉神经病变在放化疗后比单纯放疗后更常见,放化疗组 5 年的 2 级或更严重神经病变发生率为 6%(201 名女性中有 13 名),单纯放疗组为 0%(187 名女性中无)。没有与治疗相关的死亡。
这项更新分析显示,与单纯放疗相比,放化疗显著改善了总生存和无失败生存。对于 III 期或浆液性癌症或两者兼有患者,应作为医生和患者之间共同决策的一部分进行讨论和推荐这种治疗方案。目前正在进行随访以评估长期生存情况。
荷兰癌症协会、英国癌症研究中心、国家卫生与医学研究委员会、项目资助、澳大利亚癌症协会资助、意大利药品管理局和加拿大癌症协会研究所以及。