• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃内球囊放置术后在线随访对肥胖症的疗效与传统随访相似:一项大型倾向匹配的美国多中心研究。

Effectiveness of Online Aftercare Programs Following Intragastric Balloon Placement for Obesity Is Similar to Traditional Follow-up: a Large Propensity Matched US Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Dec;29(12):4036-4042. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04102-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-019-04102-0
PMID:31346983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6920533/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of intragastric balloons (IGB) with comprehensive lifestyle and behavioral changes is critical for ongoing weight loss. Many community and rural practices do not have access to robust obesity resources, limiting the use of IGBs. Online aftercare programs were developed in response to this need, delivering lifestyle coaching to maximize effectiveness. How these programs compare to traditional follow-up is currently unknown.

METHODS

Using propensity scoring (PS) methods, two large prospective databases of patients undergoing IGB therapy were compared to estimate the difference in percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) between groups while identifying predictors of response.

RESULTS

Seven hundred fifty-eight unique patients across 78 different participating practices (online n = 437; clinical registry n = 321) was analyzed. The mean %TBWL at balloon removal was 11% ± 6.9 with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) between online and traditional follow-up of - 1.5% TBWL (95% CI - 3-0.4%; p = 0.125). Three months post-balloon removal, the combined %TBWL was 12.2% ± 8.3 with an ETD of only 1% TBWL (95%CI - 3-3%; p = 0.08). On multivariable linear regression, each incremental follow-up was associated with increased %TBWL (β = 0.6% p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Online IGB aftercare programs provide similar weight loss compared with traditional programs. Increased lifestyle coaching whether in person or remotely is associated with more %TBWL at removal and during follow-up. Close follow-up for clinical symptoms is still warranted.

摘要

背景

胃内球囊(IGB)与全面的生活方式和行为改变相结合对于持续减肥至关重要。许多社区和农村实践无法获得强大的肥胖资源,限制了 IGB 的使用。在线随访计划就是为了满足这一需求而开发的,为最大限度地提高效果提供生活方式指导。目前尚不清楚这些计划与传统随访相比如何。

方法

使用倾向评分(PS)方法,比较了两个接受 IGB 治疗的大型前瞻性数据库,以估计两组之间的总体重减轻百分比(%TBWL)差异,同时确定反应的预测因素。

结果

分析了来自 78 个不同参与实践(在线 n=437;临床注册 n=321)的 758 名独特患者。球囊去除时的平均%TBWL 为 11%±6.9,在线和传统随访之间的估计治疗差异(ETD)为-1.5%TBWL(95%CI -3-0.4%;p=0.125)。球囊去除后 3 个月,联合%TBWL 为 12.2%±8.3,ETD 仅为 1%TBWL(95%CI -3-3%;p=0.08)。在多变量线性回归中,每次随访增量与%TBWL 的增加相关(β=0.6%,p=0.002)。

结论

在线 IGB 随访计划与传统计划提供相似的减肥效果。无论在现场还是远程进行的生活方式指导增加都与去除和随访期间更多的%TBWL 相关。仍需密切关注临床症状。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Online Aftercare Programs Following Intragastric Balloon Placement for Obesity Is Similar to Traditional Follow-up: a Large Propensity Matched US Multicenter Study.胃内球囊放置术后在线随访对肥胖症的疗效与传统随访相似:一项大型倾向匹配的美国多中心研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Dec;29(12):4036-4042. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04102-0.
2
Intragastric Balloon Treatment for Obesity: Review of Recent Studies.胃内球囊治疗肥胖症:近期研究综述
Adv Ther. 2017 Aug;34(8):1859-1875. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0562-3. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Impact of Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy With Intragastric Balloons for the Treatment of Obesity.胃内球囊辅助药物治疗肥胖症的影响。
Am Surg. 2023 Apr;89(4):707-713. doi: 10.1177/00031348211038579. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Intragastric Balloon Therapy Compared to a Multidisciplinary Weight Loss Program (OPTIFAST) in a Real-World Population: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.胃内球囊治疗与多学科减肥方案(OPTIFAST)在真实世界人群中的疗效和安全性比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Obes Facts. 2023;16(1):89-98. doi: 10.1159/000524895. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
5
Effects on physiologic measures of appetite from intragastric balloon and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: results of a prospective study.胃内球囊和内镜袖状胃成形术对食欲生理指标的影响:一项前瞻性研究的结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 May 20;135(10):1234-1241. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002097.
6
Delayed gastric emptying as a proposed mechanism of action during intragastric balloon therapy: Results of a prospective study.胃内球囊治疗期间延迟胃排空作为一种可能的作用机制:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Sep;24(9):1849-53. doi: 10.1002/oby.21555. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
The Efficacy Comparison of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: 6-Month Versus 12-Month Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty.内镜减重治疗的疗效比较:6 个月 vs. 12 个月胃内球囊 vs. 内镜袖状胃成形术。
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06398-x. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
8
Dual Intragastric Balloon: Single Ambulatory Center Spanish Experience with 60 Patients in Endoscopic Weight Loss Management.双胃内球囊:一家门诊中心对60例患者进行内镜下减重管理的西班牙经验
Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2263-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1715-6.
9
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Fluid-Filled Dual Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss.真实世界中液体填充式双胃内球囊用于减肥的安全性和疗效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1081-1088.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
The Effect of Age, Gender, and Baseline BMI on Weight Loss Outcomes in Obese Patients Undergoing Intragastric Balloon Therapy.年龄、性别和基线 BMI 对接受胃内球囊治疗的肥胖患者减肥效果的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Nov;29(11):3542-3546. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04023-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Health Coach-Led, Text-Based Digital Behavior Change Intervention on Weight Loss and Psychological Well-Being in Patients Receiving a Procedureless Intragastric Balloon Program: Prospective Single-Arm Study.健康教练主导的、基于文本的数字行为改变干预对接受无创胃内球囊治疗的患者体重减轻和心理健康的影响:前瞻性单臂研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 31;8:e54723. doi: 10.2196/54723.
2
Does endoscopic mean safer? A comparison of the short-term safety of endoscopic versus laparoscopic bariatric therapies.内镜治疗意味着更安全吗?内镜与腹腔镜减肥治疗短期安全性的比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E307-E310. doi: 10.1055/a-1783-8573. eCollection 2022 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalization of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Based on Physiology: a Prospective Feasibility Study with a Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon.基于生理学的内镜减重和代谢治疗的个体化:一种单腔充液胃内球囊的前瞻性可行性研究。
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3347-3353. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04581-6.
2
Randomized sham-controlled trial of the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss.随机假对照试验:6 个月可吞服充气球囊系统治疗肥胖。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Dec;14(12):1876-1889. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.09.486. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Effectiveness of an App and Provider Counseling for Obesity Treatment in Primary Care.应用程序和提供者咨询对初级保健肥胖治疗的效果。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6):777-786. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Differences in Obesity Prevalence by Demographic Characteristics and Urbanization Level Among Adults in the United States, 2013-2016.美国成年人中,按人口统计学特征和城市化水平划分的肥胖患病率差异,2013-2016 年。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 19;319(23):2419-2429. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7270.
5
Fluid-Filled Versus Gas-Filled Intragastric Balloons as Obesity Interventions: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.充液型与充气型胃内球囊用于肥胖干预的效果比较:一项随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2617-2625. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3227-7.
6
Endobariatrics: A Primer.内镜减重治疗:入门指南。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;16(11):1701-1704. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Fluid-Filled Dual Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss.真实世界中液体填充式双胃内球囊用于减肥的安全性和疗效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1081-1088.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
8
Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon Safe and Effective for Inducing Weight Loss in a Real-World Population.单腔胃内注液球囊在真实人群中诱导减重安全有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1073-1080.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures.使用广义倾向评分匹配法时对数量型或连续性暴露因素进行协变量均衡性评估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1365-1377. doi: 10.1177/0962280218756159. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
Obesity Pharmacotherapy.肥胖症药物治疗
Med Clin North Am. 2018 Jan;102(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.08.010.