• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生理学的内镜减重和代谢治疗的个体化:一种单腔充液胃内球囊的前瞻性可行性研究。

Personalization of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Based on Physiology: a Prospective Feasibility Study with a Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sanchinarro University Hospital of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3347-3353. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04581-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04581-6
PMID:32285333
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intragastric balloon (IGB) is commonly used for weight loss. Identifying patients who are most likely to tolerate and benefit from IGB therapy will optimize outcomes. Our aims were to prospectively utilize a gastric emptying study to predict intolerance and treatment response with a single fluid-filled IGB and to develop a physiologic prediction model with a treatment algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 patients had a gastric emptying study before and 2-3 months after placement of an IGB. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate likelihood ratios and to develop a physiologic prediction model.

RESULTS

Patients in the higher gastric retention quartile at baseline had a 6.2-time higher likelihood ratio for early balloon removal secondary to intolerance (p = 0.013). Utilizing baseline gastric emptying to predict intolerance to the IGB may have prevented 75% of early removal cases. Decreased gastric emptying at 3 months after balloon placement was significantly correlated with percent total body weight loss (%TWBL) at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.01 and p = 0.014, respectively). At 6 months after IGB, patients with no change in their gastric emptying at 3 months lost significantly less weight compared with those with increased gastric retention (median %TBWL = 9.0% [4.5-14.7] versus 17.3% [12.2-24.4], p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Utilizing gastric emptying as a physiologic predictor of intolerance and response to the single fluid-filled IGB can improve outcomes. This pilot feasibility trial ushers in the era of personalized endoscopic bariatric therapies to maximize patients' tolerance, cost-effectiveness, and meaningful weight loss.

摘要

背景

胃内球囊(IGB)常用于减肥。确定最有可能耐受和受益于 IGB 治疗的患者将优化治疗效果。我们的目的是前瞻性地利用胃排空研究来预测单一充盈型 IGB 的不耐受和治疗反应,并制定一种包含治疗算法的生理预测模型。

材料与方法

共 32 例患者在放置 IGB 前后进行了胃排空研究。进行多项逻辑回归分析以计算似然比并建立生理预测模型。

结果

基线时胃潴留较高的患者,因不耐受而早期移除球囊的可能性高 6.2 倍(p=0.013)。利用基线胃排空来预测对 IGB 的不耐受可能避免了 75%的早期移除病例。放置球囊 3 个月后的胃排空减少与 6 个月和 12 个月时的体重总减轻百分比(%TBWL)呈显著相关(p=0.01 和 p=0.014)。在 IGB 放置 6 个月后,3 个月时胃排空无变化的患者与胃潴留增加的患者相比,体重减轻明显较少(中位数%TBWL=9.0%[4.5-14.7]与 17.3%[12.2-24.4],p=0.016)。

结论

利用胃排空作为单一充盈型 IGB 不耐受和治疗反应的生理预测因子,可以改善治疗效果。这项初步可行性试验开创了个性化内镜减重治疗的时代,旨在提高患者的耐受性、成本效益和有意义的减重效果。

相似文献

1
Personalization of Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies Based on Physiology: a Prospective Feasibility Study with a Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon.基于生理学的内镜减重和代谢治疗的个体化:一种单腔充液胃内球囊的前瞻性可行性研究。
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3347-3353. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04581-6.
2
Effects on physiologic measures of appetite from intragastric balloon and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: results of a prospective study.胃内球囊和内镜袖状胃成形术对食欲生理指标的影响:一项前瞻性研究的结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 May 20;135(10):1234-1241. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002097.
3
Intragastric Balloon Treatment for Obesity: Review of Recent Studies.胃内球囊治疗肥胖症:近期研究综述
Adv Ther. 2017 Aug;34(8):1859-1875. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0562-3. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
4
The Efficacy Comparison of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies: 6-Month Versus 12-Month Intragastric Balloon Versus Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty.内镜减重治疗的疗效比较:6 个月 vs. 12 个月胃内球囊 vs. 内镜袖状胃成形术。
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06398-x. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
5
Delayed gastric emptying as a proposed mechanism of action during intragastric balloon therapy: Results of a prospective study.胃内球囊治疗期间延迟胃排空作为一种可能的作用机制:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Sep;24(9):1849-53. doi: 10.1002/oby.21555. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
Single Fluid-Filled Intragastric Balloon Safe and Effective for Inducing Weight Loss in a Real-World Population.单腔胃内注液球囊在真实人群中诱导减重安全有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1073-1080.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
7
The Effect of the Intra-gastric Balloon on Gastric Emptying and the DeMeester Score.胃内球囊对胃排空和德梅斯特评分的影响。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):38-45. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04039-4.
8
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Fluid-Filled Dual Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss.真实世界中液体填充式双胃内球囊用于减肥的安全性和疗效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1081-1088.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Fluid-filled intragastric balloons are an effective and safe weight loss option across BMI and age ranges.充满液体的胃内气球是一种有效且安全的减肥选择,适用于不同 BMI 和年龄段的人群。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5160-5166. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08892-2. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
10
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the FDA-approved Intragastric Balloon Systems in a Clinical Setting.比较在临床环境下,获得 FDA 批准的胃内球囊系统的疗效和安全性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 1;57(6):578-585. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001718.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Medicine in Bariatric Procedures.减重手术中的精准医学。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2024 Oct;34(4):765-779. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Evaluating the Safety of the Intragastric Balloon: Spanish Multicenter Experience in 20,680 Cases and with 12 Different Balloon Models.评估胃内球囊的安全性:西班牙 20680 例和 12 种不同球囊模型的多中心经验。
Obes Surg. 2024 Aug;34(8):2766-2777. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07342-x. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Cumulative effect of obesity phenotypes on body weight and body mass index.

本文引用的文献

1
Through Thick and Thin: Identifying Barriers to Bariatric Surgery, Weight Loss Maintenance, and Tailoring Obesity Treatment for the Future.同甘共苦:识别减重手术的障碍、维持体重减轻以及为未来量身定制肥胖治疗方案。
Surg Res Pract. 2016;2016:8616581. doi: 10.1155/2016/8616581. Epub 2016 May 23.
2
Tolerance of intragastric balloon and patient's satisfaction in obesity treatment.胃内球囊在肥胖治疗中的耐受性及患者满意度
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Sep;10(3):445-9. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54047. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
3
Assessment of symptoms during gastric emptying scintigraphy to correlate symptoms to delayed gastric emptying.
肥胖表型对体重和体重指数的累积效应。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Jun;48(6):884-890. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01492-9. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Obesity: A Review of Pathophysiology and Classification.肥胖症:病理生理学与分类综述。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Dec;98(12):1842-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.05.026. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Effect of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty on gastric emptying, motility and hormones: a comparative prospective study.内镜袖状胃成形术对胃排空、动力和激素的影响:一项比较前瞻性研究。
Gut. 2023 Jun;72(6):1073-1080. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327816. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Precision Medicine for Obesity.肥胖症的精准医学
Dig Dis Interv. 2021 Sep;5(3):239-248. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729945.
7
Precision Medicine and Obesity.精准医学与肥胖症。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2022;274:467-485. doi: 10.1007/164_2021_566.
8
Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?六种胃内球囊:该如何选择?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Aug 16;13(8):238-259. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238.
9
Association of gastric emptying with postprandial appetite and satiety sensations in obesity.肥胖患者胃排空与餐后食欲和饱腹感的关系。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Sep;29(9):1497-1507. doi: 10.1002/oby.23204. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
Endoscopic Procedures for Weight Loss.减肥的内镜手术
Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Sep;10(3):290-300. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00450-0. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
评估胃排空闪烁显像期间的症状,将症状与胃排空延迟相关联。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 May;22(5):539-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01454.x. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
4
Gastric emptying and intragastric balloon in obese patients.肥胖患者的胃排空与胃内球囊
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005 Sep-Oct;9(5 Suppl 1):15-21.