• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量癌症患者家属的负担:照顾者反应评估-印度尼西亚版的跨文化翻译和心理测量测试。

Measuring the Burden on Family Caregivers of People With Cancer: Cross-cultural Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment-Indonesian Version.

机构信息

Author Affiliations: IQHealthcare (Mrs Kristanti and Prof Vernooij-Dassen) and Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine (Dr Engels), Radboud UMC, the Netherlands; and School of Nursing (Mrs Kristanti and Dr Effendy and Prof Vernooij-Dassen) and Public Health and Policy Department (Prof Utarini), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000733.

DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000733
PMID:31348026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7713759/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) is considered one of the well-developed instruments for measuring the multidimensional burden of family caregivers. To date, there is no available validated instrument to assist healthcare professionals in measuring the caregiver's burden in Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE

To translate the CRA from English into Indonesian and to conduct psychometric testing of this CRA-Indonesian version (CRA-ID) with family caregivers of patients with cancer.

METHODS

Cross-cultural translation and psychometric testing were conducted. Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed to check, explore, and confirm the best model for the CRA-ID; internal consistency was also measured.

RESULTS

A total of 451 respondents participated, of whom 40 were involved in the feasibility testing. Confirmatory factor analysis with the original factors of the CRA revealed that the fit was not satisfactory, and adaptation was needed. Through exploratory factor analysis, the best model fit was developed, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed again. Five factors from the original instrument were confirmed with an explained variance of 54.89%. Almost all items in the CRA-ID appeared to have a similar structure as the original version. Cronbach's α's ranged between .64 and .81.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRA-ID appeared to be feasible, valid, and reliable for measuring the burden of family caregivers of patients with cancer in Indonesia.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses can use the CRA-ID to measure family caregivers' burden. Its availability in the Indonesian language enhances the opportunity to conduct international comparisons of family caregiver burden using the same instrument.

摘要

背景

caregiver reaction assessment(CRA)被认为是一种测量家庭照顾者多维负担的成熟工具。迄今为止,印度尼西亚还没有可用的经过验证的工具来帮助医疗保健专业人员测量照顾者的负担。

目的

将 CRA 从英文翻译成印度尼西亚文,并对癌症患者的家庭照顾者进行 CRA-印尼文版本(CRA-ID)的心理测量测试。

方法

进行跨文化翻译和心理测量测试。进行验证性因子分析和探索性因子分析,以检查、探索和确认 CRA-ID 的最佳模型;还测量了内部一致性。

结果

共有 451 名受访者参与,其中 40 名参与了可行性测试。使用 CRA 的原始因子进行验证性因子分析表明,拟合度不理想,需要进行调整。通过探索性因子分析,开发了最佳模型拟合度,并再次进行验证性因子分析。从原始工具中确认了五个因素,解释方差为 54.89%。CRA-ID 中的几乎所有项目似乎都具有与原始版本相似的结构。Cronbach's α 值在.64 到.81 之间。

结论

CRA-ID 似乎在印度尼西亚测量癌症患者家庭照顾者负担方面是可行、有效和可靠的。

实践意义

护士可以使用 CRA-ID 来衡量家庭照顾者的负担。它的印度尼西亚语可用性增加了使用相同工具进行家庭照顾者负担国际比较的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/7713759/3b6b552f662b/ncc-44-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/7713759/3b6b552f662b/ncc-44-37-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea8d/7713759/3b6b552f662b/ncc-44-37-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the Burden on Family Caregivers of People With Cancer: Cross-cultural Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment-Indonesian Version.测量癌症患者家属的负担:照顾者反应评估-印度尼西亚版的跨文化翻译和心理测量测试。
Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000733.
2
The Indonesian Version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale: Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing.《锻炼自我效能感量表印尼文版:跨文化调适与心理计量学测试》
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):300-305. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
3
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Experience of Caregiving Inventory (ECI) among caregivers of individuals with an eating disorder.西班牙语版体验式照护者量表(ECI)在照护进食障碍患者的照护者中的心理测量学特性。
Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Apr;25(2):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0587-x. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Validity, reliability, and feasibility of the German version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment scale (G-CRA): a validation study.《 caregiver reaction assessment scale (G-CRA) 德文版的有效性、可靠性和可行性:一项验证研究》
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Oct;25(10):1621-8. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001178. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
5
Measuring both negative and positive reactions to giving care to cancer patients: psychometric qualities of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA).衡量照顾癌症患者时的负面和正面反应:照顾者反应评估量表(CRA)的心理测量学特性
Soc Sci Med. 1999 May;48(9):1259-69. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00426-2.
6
Pediatric renal caregiver burden scale: Psychometric properties of the Turkish version.儿科肾脏护理者负担量表:土耳其语版本的心理测量特性。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;77:e593-e601. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.05.026. Epub 2024 May 25.
7
Psychometric properties and relations with coping and family strain of the Health Services and Caregiver Experience questionnaire (HSCE): an outcome measure of informal caregivers' experience for inpatient care in Italy.健康服务与照顾者体验问卷(HSCE)的心理测量特性及其与应对方式和家庭压力的关系:意大利住院护理中非正式照顾者体验的一项结果测量指标
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2317-x.
8
Needs analysis of family caregivers of people living with dementia in Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta.思乐曼摄政区(印度尼西亚日惹特区)痴呆患者家属的需求分析。
Psychogeriatrics. 2024 Jul;24(4):897-908. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13145. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
9
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale.土耳其版《家庭照料者药物管理困扰量表》的信度和效度。
Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14;41(4):596-604. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad040.
10
Psychometric Testing of an Indonesian-Version Diabetes Self-Management Instrument.印尼文版糖尿病自我管理工具的心理计量学测试。
J Nurs Res. 2020 Dec;28(6):e127. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000403.

引用本文的文献

1
A short form tool for clinical assessment of caregivers' reaction.一种用于临床评估照顾者反应的简短工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 12;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01844-w.
2
Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review.支持家庭照顾者的自我评估工具:一项综合综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1016. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101016.

本文引用的文献

1
Roles of Family Caregivers and Perceived Burden When Caring for Hospitalized Adult Cancer Patients: Perspective From a Low-Income Country.照顾住院成年癌症患者时的家庭照顾者角色和感知负担:来自低收入国家的观点。
Cancer Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;42(3):208-217. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000591.
2
The burden of filial piety: A qualitative study on caregiving motivations amongst family caregivers of patients with cancer in Singapore.孝道的负担:一项关于新加坡癌症患者家庭照顾者照顾动机的定性研究。
Psychol Health. 2016 Nov;31(11):1293-310. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1204450. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
Caregiver reaction assessment: psychometric properties in caregivers of advanced cancer patients.
照顾者反应评估:晚期癌症患者照顾者的心理测量特性
Psychooncology. 2017 Jun;26(6):862-865. doi: 10.1002/pon.4159. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review.癌症护理者的患者报告结局指标:一项系统综述。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Aug;25(8):1859-76. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1239-0. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Psychometric properties of carer-reported outcome measures in palliative care: A systematic review.姑息治疗中照护者报告结局指标的心理测量学特性:一项系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;30(1):23-44. doi: 10.1177/0269216315601930. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation of instruments assessing breastfeeding determinants: a multi-step approach.评估母乳喂养决定因素的工具的跨文化调适:多步骤方法。
Int Breastfeed J. 2014 Sep 21;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-9-16. eCollection 2014.
7
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
The neglected burden of caregiving in low- and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家中被忽视的照护负担
Disabil Health J. 2014 Jul;7(3):262-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
9
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the caregiver reaction assessment scale in family caregivers of cancer patients.癌症患者家庭照顾者中韩文版照顾者反应评估量表的效度和信度
Psychooncology. 2013 Dec;22(12):2864-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3364. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
10
Validity, reliability, and feasibility of the German version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment scale (G-CRA): a validation study.《 caregiver reaction assessment scale (G-CRA) 德文版的有效性、可靠性和可行性:一项验证研究》
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Oct;25(10):1621-8. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001178. Epub 2013 Jul 25.