Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (Ms McGrew and Drs Peck, Vesely, Janitz, and Campbell); and Oklahoma Area Tribal Epidemiology Center, Southern Plains Tribal Health Board, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (Messrs Snider and Dougherty).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Sep/Oct;25 Suppl 5, Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years(Suppl 5 TRIBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTERS ADVANCING PUBLIC HEALTH IN INDIAN COUNTRY FOR OVER 20 YEARS):S29-S35. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000993.
To compare risks of distant-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis between whites and American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) and to explore effect modification by area-based socioeconomic status (SES).
Retrospective cohort study using data from the Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry.
Oklahoma.
White and AI/AN cases of CRC diagnosed in Oklahoma between 2001 and 2008 (N = 8 438). A subanalysis was performed on the cohort of those aged 50 years and older (N = 7 728).
Risk of distant-stage CRC diagnosis stratified by SES score.
Race and SES were independently associated with distant-stage diagnosis. In SES-stratified analyses, AI/ANs in the 2 lowest SES groups experienced increased risks in the overall cohort and among those aged 50 years and older. In multivariable models, risks remained significant among those aged 50 years and older in the lowest SES groups (Adjusted risk ratio SES score of 2: 1.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.63 and adjusted risk ratio SES score of 1: 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.44).
Socioeconomic status is an effect modifier in the association between race/ethnicity and stage at CRC diagnosis. Disparities in stage at CRC diagnosis exist between AI/ANs and whites with lower estimated SES. Efforts are needed to increase CRC screening among lower SES AI/ANs.
比较白人和美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/ANs)之间远处结直肠癌(CRC)诊断的风险,并探讨基于区域社会经济地位(SES)的效应修饰作用。
使用俄克拉荷马中央癌症登记处的数据进行回顾性队列研究。
俄克拉荷马州。
2001 年至 2008 年期间在俄克拉荷马州诊断为 CRC 的白人和 AI/AN 病例(N=8438)。对年龄在 50 岁及以上的队列进行了亚分析(N=7728)。
按 SES 评分分层的远处 CRC 诊断风险。
种族和 SES 与远处诊断独立相关。在 SES 分层分析中,2 个最低 SES 组的 AI/AN 在整个队列和年龄在 50 岁及以上的人群中均面临更高的风险。在多变量模型中,年龄在 50 岁及以上的人群中,最低 SES 组的风险仍然显著(SES 评分 2 的调整风险比为 1.31,95%置信区间:1.06-1.63;SES 评分 1 的调整风险比为 1.21,95%置信区间:1.01-1.44)。
社会经济地位是种族/民族与 CRC 诊断分期之间关联的效应修饰因素。在 CRC 诊断分期方面,AI/AN 与 SES 较低的白人之间存在差异。需要努力增加 SES 较低的 AI/AN 的 CRC 筛查。