Graduate School of Education, Yongin Univerisity, 134 Yongindaehak-ro, cheoin-gu, Yongin-si 449-714, Korea.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 25;16(15):2663. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152663.
To examine the validity and reliability of the Fitbit Charge HR (FCH), wrist-worn ActiGraph (AG) accelerometers were used for assessing the classification of physical activity (PA) into intensity categories in children. Forty-three children (n = 43) participated in the study. Each participant completed 3 min bouts of 12 PAs ranging from sedentary to vigorous intensity while simultaneously wearing FCH and AG on both hands, a Polar HR monitor, and a portable indirect calorimeter. Total time spent in different PA intensity levels measured by FCH and AG were compared to the indirect calorimetry. The highest classification accuracy values of sedentary behavior was 81.1% for FCH. The highest classification (72.4%) of light intensity PA was observed with Crouter's algorithm from the non-dominant wrist. Crouter's algorithm also show the highest classification (81.8%) for assessing moderate to vigorous intensity PA compared to FCH (70.8%). Across the devices, a high degree of reliability was found in step measurements, ranging from an intra-class correlation (ICC) = 0.92 to an ICC = 0.94. The reliability of the AG and the FCH showed high agreement for each variable. The FCH shows better validity for estimating sedentary behavior and similar validity for assessing moderate to vigorous PA compared to the research-grade monitor. Across the devices, the reliability showed the strongest association.
为了检验 Fitbit Charge HR(FCH)的有效性和可靠性,腕戴式 ActiGraph(AG)加速度计被用于评估儿童的身体活动(PA)强度分类。43 名儿童(n=43)参与了研究。每位参与者在同时佩戴 FCH 和 AG 于双手、Polar HR 监测器和便携式间接测热仪的情况下,完成了 3 分钟 12 种从久坐到剧烈强度的活动。FCH 和 AG 测量的不同 PA 强度水平的总时间与间接测热法进行了比较。FCH 对久坐行为的最高分类准确率为 81.1%。非优势手腕的 Crouter 算法观察到轻强度 PA 的最高分类(72.4%)。与 FCH(70.8%)相比,Crouter 算法还显示出评估中等到剧烈强度 PA 的最高分类(81.8%)。在这些设备中,步测的可靠性非常高,范围从组内相关系数(ICC)=0.92 到 ICC=0.94。AG 和 FCH 的可靠性对于每个变量都显示出高度的一致性。与研究级监测器相比,FCH 在估计久坐行为方面具有更好的有效性,在评估中等到剧烈 PA 方面具有相似的有效性。在这些设备中,可靠性显示出最强的关联。