• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非标准经济行为之间的经验关系。

The empirical relationship between nonstandard economic behaviors.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.

Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 13;116(33):16262-16267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821353116. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1821353116
PMID:31350346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6697808/
Abstract

We study the joint distribution of 11 behavioral phenomena in a group of 190 laboratory subjects and compare it to the predictions of existing models as a step in the development of a parsimonious, general model of economic choice. We find strong correlations between most measures of risk and time preference, between compound lottery and ambiguity aversion, and between loss aversion and the endowment effect. Our results support some, but not all attempts to unify behavioral economic phenomena. Overconfidence and gender are also predictive of some behavioral characteristics.

摘要

我们研究了 190 名实验室被试者的 11 种行为现象的联合分布,并将其与现有模型的预测结果进行了比较,这是开发简约、通用的经济选择模型的一个步骤。我们发现,大多数风险和时间偏好指标之间、复合彩票和模糊厌恶之间以及损失厌恶和禀赋效应之间存在很强的相关性。我们的结果支持但并非所有试图统一行为经济学现象的尝试。过度自信和性别也可以预测某些行为特征。

相似文献

1
The empirical relationship between nonstandard economic behaviors.非标准经济行为之间的经验关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 13;116(33):16262-16267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821353116. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Cognitive Fatigue Destabilizes Economic Decision Making Preferences and Strategies.认知疲劳会破坏经济决策偏好和策略的稳定性。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0132022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132022. eCollection 2015.
3
Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.了解埃尔斯伯格悖论会减少但不会消除模糊厌恶。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0228782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228782. eCollection 2020.
4
Gender differences in sleep deprivation effects on risk and inequality aversion: evidence from an economic experiment.睡眠剥夺对风险和不平等厌恶影响的性别差异:来自一项经济实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120029. eCollection 2015.
5
Impairment of decision-making in multiple sclerosis: A neuroeconomic approach.多发性硬化症患者的决策障碍:一种神经经济学方法。
Mult Scler. 2017 Nov;23(13):1762-1771. doi: 10.1177/1352458516682103. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
6
Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments.来源偏好与模糊规避:来自行为和神经成像实验的模型与证据
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008;20:179-201.
7
Monoamines and assessment of risks.单胺类物质与风险评估。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1062-7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Beyond lottery-evoked ambiguity aversion: The neural signature of the types and the sources of uncertainty.超越彩票诱发的模糊厌恶:不确定性的类型和来源的神经特征。
Neuroimage. 2022 May 1;251:119007. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119007. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.论认知能力与风险偏好的关系。
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):115-34.
10
Foraging in a non-foraging task: Fitness maximization explains human risk preference dynamics under changing environment.在非觅食任务中觅食:适应环境变化的人类风险偏好动态的最大适应度解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 13;20(5):e1012080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012080. eCollection 2024 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making under Uncertainty: How Easterners and Westerners Think Differently.不确定性下的决策:东西方人的思维差异
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;12(4):92. doi: 10.3390/bs12040092.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring and Controlling for the Compromise Effect When Estimating Risk Preference Parameters.在估计风险偏好参数时对折衷效应进行测量与控制。
Exp Econ. 2020 Dec;23(4):1069-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10683-019-09640-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
2
WHO IS 'BEHAVIORAL'? COGNITIVE ABILITY AND ANOMALOUS PREFERENCES.谁是“行为学意义上的”?认知能力与异常偏好。
J Eur Econ Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;11(6):1231-1255. doi: 10.1111/jeea.12055.
3
Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits.风险偏好与主要心理特征具有心理计量学结构。
Sci Adv. 2017 Oct 4;3(10):e1701381. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701381. eCollection 2017 Oct.
4
Complementary cognitive capabilities, economic decision making, and aging.互补认知能力、经济决策与衰老。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Sep;28(3):595-613. doi: 10.1037/a0034172.
5
Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment.认知技能会影响经济偏好、战略行为和工作依恋。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 12;106(19):7745-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812360106. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
6
The trouble with overconfidence.过度自信的问题。
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):502-17. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502.