Suppr超能文献

外用抗皱面霜治疗外眦纹的比较

Comparison of topical antiaging creams in the management of lateral canthal lines.

作者信息

Carroll Julia M, Hanna Sam, Guenther Lyn C, Boucher Nathalie

机构信息

Compass Dermatology, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Mar;19(3):694-704. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13062. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared an antiaging treatment with two currently marketed cosmetic antiaging products for the treatment of lateral canthal lines ("crow's feet").

METHODS

Healthy female volunteers (72) aged of 54.6 years (mean) having fine-to-moderate wrinkles in the lateral canthal areas were randomized to one of three treatments applied daily over 28 days: Group A (Purgenesis™ Day Cream, Purgenesis™ Eye Cream, and Purgenesis™ Night Cream); Group B (Prevage Eye Lotion, Prevage Day Cream, and Prevage Night Cream); or Group C (La Mer Eye Balm, Crème de La Mer , and La Mer Night Cream). The effects on anti-wrinkle properties and for sensory attributes and general performance were evaluated on Days 1, 7, and 28.

RESULTS

Skin hydration improved significantly at all time points in Groups A and B, and at Day 28 in Group C. Group A patients experienced significant improvements in measured skin elasticity parameters at Day 28; extensibility and maximum amplitude were significantly better at Day 28 in Groups B and C. Benefits were also seen in profilometric parameters with statistical significance only in Group A Volunteer tolerance was good with all three treatments, although moderate and high levels of adverse events were numerically higher in Group B than in Groups A or C, and levels of slight discomfort were significantly more prevalent in Group B.

CONCLUSION

The Purgenesis™ antiaging treatment significantly improved skin hydration, elasticity, and profilometry parameters during a 28-day study. This therapy was found to be well tolerated and effective in countering the cutaneous signs of aging.

摘要

目的

本研究将一种抗老化治疗方法与两种目前市场上销售的美容抗老化产品进行比较,以治疗外眦纹(“鱼尾纹”)。

方法

72名平均年龄为54.6岁、外眦区域有轻度至中度皱纹的健康女性志愿者被随机分为三组,在28天内每天接受一种治疗:A组(Purgenesis™日霜、Purgenesis™眼霜和Purgenesis™晚霜);B组(Prevage眼部护理液、Prevage日霜和Prevage晚霜);或C组(海蓝之谜眼霜、海蓝之谜精华面霜和海蓝之谜晚霜)。在第1天、第7天和第28天评估对抗皱性能、感官属性和总体表现的影响。

结果

A组和B组在所有时间点皮肤水合作用均显著改善,C组在第28天皮肤水合作用显著改善。A组患者在第28天测量的皮肤弹性参数有显著改善;B组和C组在第28天的伸展性和最大幅度显著更好。在轮廓测量参数方面也有改善,但仅在A组有统计学意义。所有三种治疗方法志愿者耐受性良好,尽管B组中度和高度不良事件在数量上高于A组或C组,且B组轻度不适水平显著更普遍。

结论

在为期28天的研究中,Purgenesis™抗老化治疗显著改善了皮肤水合作用、弹性和轮廓测量参数。发现该疗法耐受性良好,对对抗皮肤衰老迹象有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61bc/7027448/e17c2af9504d/JOCD-19-694-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验