• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算降低初次剖宫产术的财务影响。

Estimating the Financial Impact of Reducing Primary Cesareans.

机构信息

Division of Midwifery and Community Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts.

Clinical Financial Planning and Decision Support, Baystate Health, Springfield, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13010. Epub 2019 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13010
PMID:31353803
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Preventing a primary cesarean birth in nulliparous women with term, singleton, vertex pregnancies (NTSV) is recognized as an important strategy to reduce maternal morbidities and risks to the newborn. Multiple professional organizations are supporting approaches to safely reduce NTSV cesarean rates, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; and the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. The American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM) is leading one such effort as part of its Healthy Birth Initiative: the Reducing Primary Cesareans (RPC) Learning Collaborative. The objective of this study is to estimate the cost savings of a decrease in NTSV cesareans at one hospital participating in the RPC Learning Collaborative.

METHODS

All women giving birth at Baystate Medical Center from October 1, 2016, to March 31, 2017, and their newborns were identified by Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (N = 1747). Total hospital costs were calculated using a resource consumption profile for each of 6 groups: women who had vaginal birth, primary cesarean, and repeat cesarean and their linked newborns. A model was developed to estimate cost differences for the first and second births and overall cost savings.

RESULTS

For the NTSV birth, total costs for primary cesarean and newborn care were $5989 higher compared with vaginal birth and newborn care. For the subsequent birth, repeat cesareans and newborn care were $4250 higher compared with vaginal birth. In 2016, 69 primary cesareans were prevented, for an actual cost savings of $413,241. Projecting the prevention of 66 subsequent repeat cesareans would result in additional savings of $280,500, for a total savings of $693,741. Apgar score at 5 minutes and length of stay remained unchanged.

DISCUSSION

Participation in ACNM's RPC Learning Collaborative led to significant savings in hospital costs during the first year without affecting quality metrics. This cost comparison model could be replicated by other hospitals involved in cesarean reduction endeavors.

摘要

简介

在无并发症的初产妇中预防足月、单胎、头位(NTSV)剖宫产被认为是减少产妇发病率和新生儿风险的重要策略。许多专业组织都支持采取安全措施来降低 NTSV 剖宫产率,其中包括美国妇产科医师学会;母胎医学学会;以及妇女健康、产科和新生儿护士协会。美国护理助产士学院(ACNM)正在领导一项这样的努力,作为其健康分娩倡议的一部分:减少主要剖宫产(RPC)学习合作。本研究的目的是估计参与 RPC 学习合作的一家医院 NTSV 剖宫产减少所带来的成本节约。

方法

通过 Medicare 严重程度诊断相关组(N = 1747),确定 2016 年 10 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日在 Baystate 医疗中心分娩的所有妇女及其新生儿。使用每个 6 组的资源消耗情况来计算总医院成本:阴道分娩、初次剖宫产和重复剖宫产的妇女及其新生儿。建立了一个模型来估计第一胎和第二胎的成本差异以及总体成本节约。

结果

对于 NTSV 分娩,初次剖宫产和新生儿护理的总费用比阴道分娩和新生儿护理高 5989 美元。对于随后的分娩,重复剖宫产和新生儿护理比阴道分娩高 4250 美元。2016 年,预防了 69 例初次剖宫产,实际节省了 413241 美元。如果预计预防 66 例随后的重复剖宫产,将额外节省 280500 美元,总节省 693741 美元。阿普加评分 5 分钟和住院时间保持不变。

讨论

参与 ACNM 的 RPC 学习合作导致了第一年医院成本的显著节省,而没有影响质量指标。其他参与剖宫产减少工作的医院可以复制这种成本比较模型。

相似文献

1
Estimating the Financial Impact of Reducing Primary Cesareans.估算降低初次剖宫产术的财务影响。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13010. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
2
Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California.加利福尼亚州初产妇、足月、单胎、头位剖宫产率的医院质量改进干预措施、全州政策倡议
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1631-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3816.
3
Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.评估佛罗里达州低风险剖宫产指标的医院差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;229(6):684.e1-684.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Do provider birth attitudes influence cesarean delivery rate: a cross-sectional study.医生的分娩态度是否会影响剖宫产率:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 29;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1756-7.
5
Safety Assessment of a Large-Scale Improvement Collaborative to Reduce Nulliparous Cesarean Delivery Rates.大规模改善合作以降低初产妇剖宫产率的安全性评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):613-623. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003109.
6
Outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in women with one versus two prior cesarean deliveries after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital.在学术医院临床实践指南改变后,对于一次或两次剖宫产史的妇女再次尝试剖宫产的结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 May;33(9):1499-1504. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1520831. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement.是否存在有用的剖宫产衡量指标?评估初产妇足月单胎头位剖宫产率作为改善产科质量的工具。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1644-51; discussion 1651-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
8
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.健康初产妇分娩时医疗服务提供者类型与剖宫产之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Comparison of Midwifery and Obstetric Care in Low-Risk Hospital Births.低危医院分娩中助产护理与产科护理的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1056-1065. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003521.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between nurse staffing during labor and cesarean birth rates in U.S. hospitals.美国医院分娩期间护士配备与剖宫产率之间的关系。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 Mar-Apr;73(2):102346. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102346. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Evidence-Based Strategies to Minimize Unnecessary Primary Cesarean Sections: A Comprehensive Review.尽量减少不必要的剖宫产的循证策略:全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74729. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74729. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Challenges in the Triage Care of Low-Risk Laboring Patients: A Comparison of 2 Models of Practice.
低危临产患者分诊护理中的挑战:两种实践模式的比较。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2021;35(2):123-131. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000552.