• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预先设定的焦虑情绪可预测不同时间限制条件下未来的决策表现。

Pre-specified Anxiety Predicts Future Decision-Making Performances Under Different Temporally Constrained Conditions.

作者信息

Soshi Takahiro, Nagamine Mitsue, Fukuda Emiko, Takeuchi Ai

机构信息

Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Institute for Liberal Arts, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01544. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01544
PMID:31354572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6634256/
Abstract

In real-life circumstances, people occasionally require making forced decisions when encountering unpredictable events and situations that yield socially and privately unfavorable consequences. In order to prevent future negative consequences, it is beneficial to successfully predict future decision-making behaviors based on various types of information, including behavioral traits and/or psychological states. For this prospective purpose, the present study used the Iowa Gambling Task, which simulates multiple aspects of real-life decision-making processes, such as choice preference, selection and evaluation of output feedback, and investigated how anxiety profiles predict decision-making performances under conditions with different temporal pressures on task execution. To conduct a temporally causal analysis, we assessed the trait and state anxiety profiles of 33 young participants prior to the task and analyzed their subsequent decision-making performances. We separated two disadvantageous card decks with high rewards and losses into high- and middle-risk decks, and calculated local performance indexes for decision-making immediately after salient penalty events for the high-risk deck in addition to traditional global performance indexes concerning overall trial outcomes such as final winnings and net scores. For global decision-making, higher trait anxiety predicted more risky choices solely in the self-paced condition without temporal pressure. For local decision-making, state anxiety predicted risk-taking performances differently in the self- and forced-paced conditions. In the self-paced condition, higher state anxiety predicted higher risk-avoidance. In the forced-paced condition, higher state anxiety predicted more frequent choices of the middle-risk deck. These findings suggest not only that pre-specified anxiety profiles can effectively predict future decision-making behaviors under different temporal pressures, but also newly indicate that behavioral mechanisms for moderate risk-taking under an emergent condition should be focused on to effectively prevent future unfavorable consequences when actually encountering negative events.

摘要

在现实生活中,人们在遇到不可预测的事件和情况并产生社会和个人层面不利后果时,偶尔需要做出被迫的决定。为了防止未来出现负面后果,基于包括行为特征和/或心理状态在内的各种信息成功预测未来的决策行为是有益的。出于这一前瞻性目的,本研究使用了爱荷华赌博任务,该任务模拟了现实生活决策过程的多个方面,如选择偏好、输出反馈的选择和评估,并研究了焦虑特征如何在任务执行存在不同时间压力的条件下预测决策表现。为了进行时间因果分析,我们在任务前评估了33名年轻参与者的特质焦虑和状态焦虑特征,并分析了他们随后的决策表现。我们将两个有高回报和高损失的不利纸牌组分为高风险和中等风险纸牌组,除了计算关于总体试验结果(如最终赢钱和净得分)的传统全局表现指标外,还计算了高风险纸牌组显著惩罚事件后立即进行决策的局部表现指标。对于全局决策,仅在没有时间压力的自定节奏条件下,较高的特质焦虑预测了更多的冒险选择。对于局部决策,状态焦虑在自定节奏和强制节奏条件下对冒险表现的预测不同。在自定节奏条件下,较高的状态焦虑预测了更高的风险规避。在强制节奏条件下,较高的状态焦虑预测了更频繁地选择中等风险纸牌组。这些发现不仅表明预先指定的焦虑特征可以有效地预测不同时间压力下的未来决策行为,还新表明在实际遇到负面事件时,应关注紧急情况下适度冒险的行为机制,以有效防止未来的不利后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/9ffe02514cf3/fpsyg-10-01544-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/0e6f1b3895c6/fpsyg-10-01544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/2e5d8a62e9a6/fpsyg-10-01544-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/bc7f127a1f6b/fpsyg-10-01544-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/6d37915843eb/fpsyg-10-01544-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/dfe9ed234fae/fpsyg-10-01544-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/9ffe02514cf3/fpsyg-10-01544-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/0e6f1b3895c6/fpsyg-10-01544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/2e5d8a62e9a6/fpsyg-10-01544-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/bc7f127a1f6b/fpsyg-10-01544-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/6d37915843eb/fpsyg-10-01544-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/dfe9ed234fae/fpsyg-10-01544-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce8c/6634256/9ffe02514cf3/fpsyg-10-01544-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Pre-specified Anxiety Predicts Future Decision-Making Performances Under Different Temporally Constrained Conditions.预先设定的焦虑情绪可预测不同时间限制条件下未来的决策表现。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01544. eCollection 2019.
2
Functional Cerebral Specialization and Decision Making in the Iowa Gambling Task: A Single-Case Study of Left-Hemispheric Atrophy and Hemispherotomy.爱荷华赌博任务中的功能性脑区特化与决策制定:左侧半球萎缩与大脑半球切除术的单病例研究
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 21;11:725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00725. eCollection 2020.
3
Trait Anxiety Has Effect on Decision Making under Ambiguity but Not Decision Making under Risk.特质焦虑对模糊情境下的决策有影响,但对风险情境下的决策没有影响。
PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0127189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127189. eCollection 2015.
4
Comparison of deck- and trial-based approaches to advantageous decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task.基于牌面和试次的优势决策制定方法在 Iowa 赌博任务中的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Jun;24(2):455-63. doi: 10.1037/a0025932. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
5
Relationships between affective states and decision-making.情感状态与决策之间的关系。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
6
Dissociation between decision making under ambiguity and risk in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.青少年肌阵挛癫痫患者在模糊决策和风险下的分离。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Dec;101(Pt A):106548. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106548. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
Modeling Skin Conductance Response Time Series during Consecutive Rapid Decision-Making under Concurrent Temporal Pressure and Information Ambiguity.在同时存在时间压力和信息模糊的情况下,对连续快速决策过程中的皮肤电传导反应时间序列进行建模。
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 25;11(9):1122. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091122.
8
Underlying decision making processes on Iowa Gambling Task.潜在的决策过程在爱荷华赌博任务中。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Jan;39:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Deficits in emotion based decision-making in schizophrenia; a new insight based on the Iowa Gambling Task.精神分裂症患者基于情绪的决策缺陷;基于爱荷华赌博任务的新见解。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 3;57:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
10
Avoidant decision making in social anxiety: the interaction of angry faces and emotional responses.回避决策在社交焦虑中的作用:愤怒面孔与情绪反应的相互影响。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 29;5:1050. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01050. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Neurological Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Complex and Potentially Significant Relationship.功能性神经障碍与自闭症谱系障碍:一种复杂且可能具有重要意义的关系。
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70168. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70168.
2
A multinational analysis of how emotions relate to economic decisions regarding time or risk.一项关于情绪如何与时间或风险的经济决策相关的跨国分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2139-2155. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01927-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
The Role of Anxiety and Prosocial Behaviors on Adherence Behaviors to Prevent COVID-19 in University Students in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Twenty Years After the Iowa Gambling Task: Rationality, Emotion, and Decision-Making.社论:爱荷华赌博任务二十年之后:理性、情感与决策
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 25;8:2353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02353. eCollection 2017.
2
Inter-individual differences in trait anxiety shape the functional connectivity between the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the amygdala during brief threat processing.个体特质焦虑的差异塑造了短暂威胁处理期间终纹床核与杏仁核之间的功能连接。
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.054. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
Trait vs. state anxiety in different threatening situations.
焦虑和亲社会行为对美国大学生预防新冠病毒依从行为的作用:横断面研究
JMIRx Med. 2024 May 27;5:e52970. doi: 10.2196/52970.
4
Decision-making psychological state and characteristic of proxies of thrombolytic patients: a pilot study.溶栓患者代理人的决策心理状态和特征:一项初步研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10345. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14124-x.
5
Differences in Learning and Persistency Characterizing Behavior in Chronic Pain for the Iowa Gambling Task: Web-Based Laboratory-in-the-Field Study.基于网络的现场实验室研究:慢性疼痛中用于 Iowa 赌博任务的学习和坚持特征的行为差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 6;24(4):e26307. doi: 10.2196/26307.
6
Modeling Skin Conductance Response Time Series during Consecutive Rapid Decision-Making under Concurrent Temporal Pressure and Information Ambiguity.在同时存在时间压力和信息模糊的情况下,对连续快速决策过程中的皮肤电传导反应时间序列进行建模。
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 25;11(9):1122. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091122.
不同威胁情境下的特质焦虑与状态焦虑
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2017 Jul-Sep;39(3):147-157. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0044. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
4
Contribution of different regions of the prefrontal cortex and lesion laterality to deficit of decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task.前额叶皮质不同区域及损伤偏侧性对爱荷华赌博任务中决策缺陷的影响
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Assessment of trait anxiety and prediction of changes in state anxiety using functional brain imaging: A test-retest study.使用功能性脑成像评估特质焦虑并预测状态焦虑的变化:一项重测研究。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jun;133:408-416. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Think twice: Impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder.三思而后行:强迫症中的冲动性与决策制定
J Behav Addict. 2015 Dec;4(4):263-72. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.039.
7
Thought Speed, Mood, and the Experience of Mental Motion.思维速度、情绪与心理运动体验。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;3(6):461-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00091.x.
8
Decision making in healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task: new insights from an operant approach.健康参与者在爱荷华赌博任务中的决策:来自操作性方法的新见解。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 7;6:391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00391. eCollection 2015.
9
Anticipatory anxiety disrupts neural valuation during risky choice.预期性焦虑会在风险选择过程中扰乱神经评估。
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3085-99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2880-14.2015.
10
Post-error action control is neurobehaviorally modulated under conditions of constant speeded response.在持续加速反应的条件下,错误后动作控制受到神经行为调节。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 26;8:1072. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01072. eCollection 2014.