Corbera Silvia, Marín-Chollom Amanda M
Department of Psychological Science, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT, United States.
JMIRx Med. 2024 May 27;5:e52970. doi: 10.2196/52970.
In situations of acute stress, individuals may engage in prosocial behaviors or risk-taking self-oriented behaviors. The COVID-19 pandemic created large stress-promoting conditions that impacted individuals' decisions to adhere to COVID-19 preventative behaviors.
The study aimed to examine the relationship between anxiety during the pandemic and adherence behaviors to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and the moderating influence of prosocial behaviors. We hypothesized that individuals with high anxiety during COVID-19 would adhere more to preventive COVID-19 behaviors than ones with low anxiety and that this relationship would be stronger in those individuals with higher prosocial behaviors.
A web-based survey was administered through the SONA web-based participant tool of the psychology department of a university in the Northeastern United States. A final sample of 54 undergraduate students completed web-based questionnaires during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, from January to May 2021, which included demographic measures and surveys on prosocial behaviors, anxiety, and COVID-19 preventive behaviors. Moderation analyses were conducted using PROCESS in SPSS.
Participants reported high levels of trait and state anxiety symptoms, most of them meeting or exceeding the cutoff criteria to be clinically meaningful (state anxiety: 47/54, 87%; trait anxiety: 38/44, 86%), and over 50% highly adhered to the COVID-19 preventive behaviors of wearing a face mask, using hand sanitizer, handwashing, coughing/sneezing into their elbow or a tissue, self-quarantining, maintaining social distance, avoiding social gatherings, and avoiding nonessential travel. No significant associations were observed between prosocial behavior, anxiety types, and adherence to COVID-19 preventive behaviors. However, when moderation analyses were conducted between anxiety types and adherence to COVID-19 preventive behaviors, results demonstrated a statistically significant interaction of public prosocial behavior with state anxiety (β=-.17, t53=-2.60; P=.01), predicting engagement in COVID-19 preventative behaviors. At high levels of anxiety, low levels of prosocial public behaviors were associated with higher engagement in COVID-19 preventative behaviors. In contrast, high levels of public prosocial behavior were associated with low engagement in COVID-19 preventative behaviors at higher levels of anxiety.
These results provide information that can aid in the creation of interventions that could increase adherence to COVID-19 preventative behaviors (Reviewed by the Plan P #PeerRef Community).
在急性应激情况下,个体可能会采取亲社会行为或冒险的自我导向行为。新冠疫情造成了巨大的压力促进条件,影响了个体遵守新冠预防行为的决定。
本研究旨在探讨疫情期间的焦虑与预防新冠传播的遵守行为之间的关系,以及亲社会行为的调节作用。我们假设,新冠疫情期间焦虑程度高的个体比焦虑程度低的个体更能遵守新冠预防行为,并且这种关系在亲社会行为较高的个体中会更强。
通过美国东北部一所大学心理学系的SONA网络参与者工具进行了一项基于网络的调查。在2021年1月至5月新冠疫情的第二波期间,最终有54名本科生完成了基于网络的问卷,其中包括人口统计学测量以及关于亲社会行为、焦虑和新冠预防行为的调查。使用SPSS中的PROCESS进行调节分析。
参与者报告了高水平的特质焦虑和状态焦虑症状,其中大多数达到或超过了具有临床意义的临界标准(状态焦虑:47/54,87%;特质焦虑:38/44,86%),超过50%的人高度遵守佩戴口罩、使用洗手液、洗手、对着肘部或纸巾咳嗽/打喷嚏、自我隔离、保持社交距离、避免社交聚会以及避免非必要旅行等新冠预防行为。未观察到亲社会行为、焦虑类型与遵守新冠预防行为之间存在显著关联。然而,在对焦虑类型与遵守新冠预防行为进行调节分析时,结果显示公共亲社会行为与状态焦虑之间存在统计学上显著的交互作用(β = -0.17,t53 = -2.60;P = 0.01),可预测参与新冠预防行为的情况。在高焦虑水平下,低水平的公共亲社会行为与更高的新冠预防行为参与度相关。相反,在较高焦虑水平下,高水平的公共亲社会行为与较低的新冠预防行为参与度相关。
这些结果提供了有助于制定干预措施的信息,这些干预措施可以提高对新冠预防行为的遵守程度(由计划P#同行评审社区审核)。