Gao Zhipeng
Department of Psychology.
Hist Psychol. 2019 Nov;22(4):309-327. doi: 10.1037/hop0000097. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
This article investigates the history of psychology in China from 1949 to 1965, with a focus on the geopolitics involving Western, Soviet, and Chinese schools of psychology. In the early 1950s, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) pressured psychologists to replace existing Western approaches with Pavlov's Soviet-sanctioned psychological theory. The shaky marriage of Pavlovian theory with Marxism, coupled with domestic and international political shifts, paved the way for two leftist criticisms of psychology, one in 1958 and the another before the Cultural Revolution in 1966. Both criticisms demanded that psychologists conceptualize mental phenomena as sociopolitically contingent and replace experimentation with class analysis. The clash between two views of human nature-the natural-biological view, which emphasized intrapersonal mental processes, and the revolutionary view, which highlighted individual connections to the sociopolitical milieu-stemmed from the Cold War ideological division, shifting Sino-Soviet relations, the CCP's conflicting commitments, and the power dynamic between the CCP and psychologists. Both critical movements were self-undermined by their violent enactment and failed to generate a fully developed Marxist psychology. In tracing these historical events, this article explores two questions. First, inspired by postcolonial historiography of psychology, it excavates Chinese Marxist critiques to rethink Western natural-scientific psychology regarding its disciplinary identity, subject matter, research methods, and social commitments. Second, by situating various schools of psychology in China's revolution, it argues that whereas natural scientific approaches of the West served scientific modernization, Chinese revolutionaries' sociopolitical approach to psychological research was tethered to class struggle. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本文考察了1949年至1965年中国心理学的历史,重点关注涉及西方、苏联和中国心理学派别的地缘政治。20世纪50年代初,中国共产党迫使心理学家用苏联认可的巴甫洛夫心理学理论取代现有的西方方法。巴甫洛夫理论与马克思主义的不稳定结合,再加上国内外政治的变化,为1958年和1966年文化大革命前对心理学的两次左派批判铺平了道路。两次批判都要求心理学家将心理现象概念化为社会政治偶然现象,并用阶级分析取代实验。两种人性观之间的冲突——强调个体内心心理过程的自然生物学观和突出个体与社会政治环境联系的革命观——源于冷战意识形态分歧、中苏关系的变化、中国共产党相互冲突的承诺以及中国共产党与心理学家之间的权力动态。两次批判运动都因暴力实施而自我破坏,未能产生一个充分发展的马克思主义心理学。在追溯这些历史事件时,本文探讨了两个问题。第一,受后殖民心理学史的启发,它挖掘中国马克思主义批判以重新思考西方自然科学心理学在学科身份、主题、研究方法和社会承诺方面的问题。第二,通过将中国的各种心理学派置于中国革命的背景中,它认为西方的自然科学方法服务于科学现代化,而中国革命者对心理学研究的社会政治方法则与阶级斗争相关联。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)