Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Transfusion. 2019 Oct;59(10):3219-3227. doi: 10.1111/trf.15463. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Despite the clinical significance of red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies, there are currently no laboratory tests available to predict which patients may be at risk of antibody formation after transfusion exposure. Given their phagocytic and inflammatory functions, we hypothesized that differences in circulating monocytes may play a role in alloimmunization.
Forty-two adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) were recruited, with data extracted from the electronic medical record and peripheral blood analyzed by flow cytometry for total monocytes, monocyte subsets (CD14 high/CD16 low+ classical monocytes, CD14 high/CD16 high+ intermediate monocytes, and CD14 intermediate/CD16 high+ non-classical/inflammatory monocytes), and FcγR1 (CD64) expression. Thirteen "non-responder" patients (non-alloimmunized patients with documented RBC transfusion at the study institution) were compared to 20 alloimmunized "responder" patients, who had a total of 44 RBC alloantibodies identified.
There were no significant differences in the percentages of total monocytes, monocyte subsets, or measured cytokines between non-responders and responders. However, non-responders had higher CD64 expression on classical monocytes (MFI mean 3424 ± standard deviation 1141) compared to responders (MFI mean 2285 ± 1501), p = 0.029, and on intermediate monocytes (MFI mean 3720 ± 1191) compared to responders (MFI mean 2497 ± 1640), p = 0.033.
Monocytes and the inflammatory milieu increasingly are being appreciated to play a role in some complications of SCD. The differences in FcγR1 expression on monocyte subsets noted between responders and non-responders, which cannot be directly explained by the serum cytokines evaluated, warrant further investigation.
尽管红细胞(RBC)同种抗体具有临床意义,但目前尚无实验室检测方法可用于预测哪些患者在输血暴露后可能有形成抗体的风险。鉴于其吞噬和炎症功能,我们假设循环单核细胞的差异可能在同种免疫中起作用。
招募了 42 名镰状细胞病(SCD)成人患者,从电子病历中提取数据,并通过流式细胞术分析外周血中的总单核细胞、单核细胞亚群(CD14 高/CD16 低+经典单核细胞、CD14 高/CD16 高+中间单核细胞和 CD14 中间/CD16 高+非经典/炎症单核细胞)和 FcγR1(CD64)表达。将 13 名“非应答者”患者(在研究机构接受 RBC 输血的无同种免疫患者)与 20 名同种免疫“应答者”患者进行比较,后者共鉴定出 44 种 RBC 同种抗体。
非应答者和应答者之间的总单核细胞、单核细胞亚群或测量的细胞因子百分比没有显著差异。然而,与应答者相比,非应答者的经典单核细胞(MFI 均值 3424±标准偏差 1141)和中间单核细胞(MFI 均值 3720±标准偏差 1191)上的 CD64 表达更高,差异有统计学意义(p=0.029 和 p=0.033)。
单核细胞和炎症环境越来越被认为在 SCD 的某些并发症中起作用。应答者和非应答者之间在单核细胞亚群上的 FcγR1 表达差异,不能直接用评估的血清细胞因子来解释,值得进一步研究。