Dushtha Shasthya Kendra, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7335-7.
How and whether health shocks, care-seeking behaviour and coping strategies are interlinked and influence households resilience to ill-health remains an under-researched subject in the context of Bangladesh. This study investigates whether and how health shocks, care-seeking processes and coping strategies interplay and impact the resilience of extremely poor adivasi (ethnic minority) households in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), Bangladesh.
Our analysis draws from qualitative data collected through a range of methods (see Additional file 1). We conducted 25 in-depth interviews (IDIs) of two adivasi communities targeted by an extreme-poverty alleviation programme, 11 key informant interviews (KIIs) with project personnel (community workers, field officers, project managers), community leaders, and healthcare providers, and 9 focus group discussions (FGDs) with community members. Data triangulation was performed to further validate the data, and a thematic analysis approach was used to analyze the data.
Health shocks were a defining characteristic of households' experiences of extreme poverty in the studied region. Care-seeking behaviours are influenced by an array of cultural and economic factors. Households adopt a range of coping strategies during the treatment or care-seeking process, which are often insufficient to allow households to maintain a stable economic status. This is largely due to the fact that healthcare costs are borne by the household, primarily through out-of-pocket payments. Households meet healthcare cost by selling their means of livelihoods, borrowing cash, and marketing livestock. This process erodes their wellbeing and hinders they attempt at achieving resilience, despite their involvement in an extreme poverty-alleviation programme.
Livelihood supports or asset-transfers alone are insufficient to improve household resilience in this context. Therefore, we argue that extreme poor households' healthcare needs should be central to the design of poverty-alleviating intervention for them to contribute to foster resilience.
在孟加拉国,健康冲击、寻求医疗服务的行为和应对策略是如何相互关联以及影响家庭对健康不良的适应能力,这仍然是一个研究不足的课题。本研究调查了健康冲击、寻求医疗服务的过程和应对策略是否以及如何相互作用,并影响孟加拉国吉大港山区(CHT)极度贫困的阿迪瓦西(少数民族)家庭的适应能力。
我们的分析来自通过一系列方法收集的定性数据(见附加文件 1)。我们对两个针对极端贫困缓解计划的阿迪瓦西社区进行了 25 次深入访谈(IDIs)、11 次与项目人员(社区工作者、实地官员、项目经理)、社区领导和医疗保健提供者的关键知情人访谈(KIIs),以及 9 次与社区成员的焦点小组讨论(FGDs)。进行了数据三角剖分以进一步验证数据,并使用主题分析方法对数据进行分析。
健康冲击是研究地区家庭极端贫困经历的一个决定性特征。寻求医疗服务的行为受到一系列文化和经济因素的影响。家庭在治疗或寻求医疗服务过程中采用了一系列应对策略,但这些策略往往不足以使家庭保持稳定的经济状况。这主要是因为医疗费用由家庭承担,主要通过自费支付。家庭通过出售生计、借款和出售牲畜来支付医疗费用。这个过程侵蚀了他们的福利,阻碍了他们实现适应能力的努力,尽管他们参与了一个极端贫困缓解计划。
在这种情况下,生计支持或资产转移本身不足以提高家庭的适应能力。因此,我们认为,极端贫困家庭的医疗保健需求应该成为设计扶贫干预措施的核心,以便为促进适应能力做出贡献。