Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands; ANSYS France, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.
Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Beech Hill Road, S10 2RX Sheffield, United Kingdom.
J Biomech. 2019 Sep 20;94:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Aortic valve stenosis is associated with an elevated left ventricular pressure and transaortic pressure drop. Clinicians routinely use Doppler ultrasound to quantify aortic valve stenosis severity by estimating this pressure drop from blood velocity. However, this method approximates the peak pressure drop, and is unable to quantify the partial pressure recovery distal to the valve. As pressure drops are flow dependent, it remains difficult to assess the true significance of a stenosis for low-flow low-gradient patients. Recent advances in segmentation techniques enable patient-specific Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of flow through the aortic valve. In this work a simulation framework is presented and used to analyze data of 18 patients. The ventricle and valve are reconstructed from 4D Computed Tomography imaging data. Ventricular motion is extracted from the medical images and used to model ventricular contraction and corresponding blood flow through the valve. Simplifications of the framework are assessed by introducing two simplified CFD models: a truncated time-dependent and a steady-state model. Model simplifications are justified for cases where the simulated pressure drop is above 10 mmHg. Furthermore, we propose a valve resistance index to quantify stenosis severity from simulation results. This index is compared to established metrics for clinical decision making, i.e. blood velocity and valve area. It is found that velocity measurements alone do not adequately reflect stenosis severity. This work demonstrates that combining 4D imaging data and CFD has the potential to provide a physiologically relevant diagnostic metric to quantify aortic valve stenosis severity.
主动脉瓣狭窄与左心室压力升高和跨主动脉压力下降有关。临床医生通常使用多普勒超声通过估计血流速度来量化主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。然而,这种方法仅能近似峰值压力下降,且无法量化瓣膜下游的部分压力恢复。由于压力下降与流量有关,因此对于低流量低梯度患者,仍然难以评估狭窄的真正意义。最近在分割技术方面的进展使通过主动脉瓣的患者特定计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟成为可能。在这项工作中,提出了一个模拟框架,并将其用于分析 18 名患者的数据。心室和瓣膜是从 4D 计算机断层扫描成像数据中重建的。心室运动从医学图像中提取出来,并用于模拟心室收缩和相应的血流通过瓣膜。通过引入两个简化的 CFD 模型,即截断的时变模型和稳态模型,评估了框架的简化。当模拟的压力下降超过 10mmHg 时,简化是合理的。此外,我们提出了一种瓣膜阻力指数,用于从模拟结果量化狭窄的严重程度。将该指数与用于临床决策的现有指标(即血流速度和瓣膜面积)进行了比较。结果发现,仅流速测量不能充分反映狭窄的严重程度。这项工作表明,结合 4D 成像数据和 CFD 有可能提供一种生理相关的诊断指标,用于量化主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。