Institute for Imaging Science and Computational Modelling in Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Aug;58(8):1667-1679. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02186-w. Epub 2020 May 26.
The transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG) is commonly estimated using the Bernoulli equation. However, the method is known to be inaccurate. Therefore, an adjusted Bernoulli model for accurate TPG assessment was developed and evaluated. Numerical simulations were used to calculate TPG in patient-specific geometries of aortic stenosis as ground truth. Geometries, aortic valve areas (AVA), and flow rates were derived from computed tomography scans. Simulations were divided in a training data set (135 cases) and a test data set (36 cases). The training data was used to fit an adjusted Bernoulli model as a function of AVA and flow rate. The model-predicted TPG was evaluated using the test data set and also compared against the common Bernoulli equation (TPG). TPG and TPG both correlated well with TPG (r > 0.94), but significantly overestimated it. The average difference between TPG and TPG was much lower: 3.3 mmHg vs. 17.3 mmHg between TPG and TPG. Also, the standard error of estimate was lower for the adjusted model: SEE = 5.3 mmHg vs. SEE = 22.3 mmHg. The adjusted model's performance was more accurate than that of the conventional Bernoulli equation. The model might help to improve non-invasive assessment of TPG. Graphical abstract Processing pipeline for the definition of an adjusted Bernoulli model for the assessment of transvalvular pressure gradient. Using CT image data, the patient specific geometry of the stenosed AVs were reconstructed. Using this segmentation, the AVA as well as the volume flow rate was calculated and used for model definition. This novel model was compared against classical approaches on a test data set, which was not used for the model definition.
跨瓣压差(TPG)通常使用伯努利方程估算。然而,该方法的准确性是已知的。因此,开发并评估了一种用于准确 TPG 评估的调整后的伯努利模型。数值模拟用于计算作为真实值的特定于主动脉瓣狭窄的患者的几何形状的 TPG。几何形状、主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和流量率源自计算机断层扫描。模拟分为训练数据集(135 例)和测试数据集(36 例)。使用训练数据拟合作为 AVA 和流量率的函数的调整后的伯努利模型。使用测试数据集评估模型预测的 TPG,并与常用的伯努利方程(TPG)进行比较。TPG 和 TPG 均与 TPG 高度相关(r>0.94),但却明显高估了 TPG。TPG 与 TPG 之间的平均差异要小得多:3.3mmHg 与 TPG 与 TPG 之间的 17.3mmHg。此外,调整后的模型的估计标准误差也较低:SEE=5.3mmHg 与 SEE=22.3mmHg。调整后的模型的性能比常规伯努利方程更准确。该模型可能有助于改善 TPG 的无创评估。
图摘要用于评估跨瓣压差(TPG)的调整后的伯努利模型的定义处理流程。使用 CT 图像数据,重建了狭窄 AV 的患者特定几何形状。使用此分割,计算了 AVA 以及体积流量率,并用于模型定义。将这种新模型与测试数据集上的经典方法进行了比较,而测试数据集未用于模型定义。