• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未来趋势对老年人医疗保健利用的综合影响:一项德尔菲研究。

Combined impact of future trends on healthcare utilisation of older people: A Delphi study.

作者信息

Ravensbergen W M, Drewes Y M, Hilderink H B M, Verschuuren M, Gussekloo J, Vonk R A A

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Internal medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):947-954. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.002
PMID:31358314
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the combined effect of trends in older people on their future healthcare utilisation.

METHODS

A Delphi study consisting of two rounds was conducted. The heterogeneous expert panel (n = 16) in the field of elderly care rated the effect of combinations of trends in the Netherlands on the use of seven healthcare services: i.e. informal, home, general practitioner, acute, specialist, nursing home and mental health care. The percentage and direction of the overall consensus, for the different health services, and for three main trends were analysed.

RESULTS

Experts reached consensus in 57 of 92 ratings (62%). Taking into account the interaction between trends, they expected an extra increase for informal, home, and general practitioner care, but no additional effect of interaction for specialist and acute care. Combinations that included trends leading to less support were expected to lead to an extra increase in utilisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Experts expect that interaction between trends will lead to an extra increase in the use of general practitioner, home, and informal care. This increase is mainly the result of interaction with trends leading to less support for older persons. The present results show the need to take the effect of interaction into account when designing new health policy and in research on future healthcare utilisation.

摘要

目的

探讨老年人趋势对其未来医疗保健利用的综合影响。

方法

开展了一项包括两轮的德尔菲研究。老年护理领域的异质性专家小组(n = 16)对荷兰各种趋势组合对七种医疗服务使用情况的影响进行了评分,这七种医疗服务分别是:非正式护理、居家护理、全科医生护理、急症护理、专科护理、养老院护理和精神卫生护理。分析了不同医疗服务以及三种主要趋势的总体共识的百分比和方向。

结果

专家们在92项评分中的57项(62%)达成了共识。考虑到趋势之间的相互作用,他们预计非正式护理、居家护理和全科医生护理会额外增加,但专科护理和急症护理的相互作用没有额外影响。预计包含导致支持减少趋势的组合会使利用率额外增加。

结论

专家们预计趋势之间的相互作用将导致全科医生护理、居家护理和非正式护理的使用额外增加。这种增加主要是与导致对老年人支持减少的趋势相互作用的结果。目前的结果表明,在设计新的卫生政策以及未来医疗保健利用研究中,需要考虑相互作用的影响。

相似文献

1
Combined impact of future trends on healthcare utilisation of older people: A Delphi study.未来趋势对老年人医疗保健利用的综合影响:一项德尔菲研究。
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):947-954. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Falls prevention activities among community-dwelling elderly in the Netherlands: A Delphi study.荷兰社区居家老年人预防跌倒活动:一项德尔菲研究。
Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):2017-2021. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
5
Trends in ageing and ageing-in-place and the future market for institutional care: scenarios and policy implications.老龄化与就地养老趋势以及机构护理的未来市场:情景与政策影响
Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Jan;14(1):82-100. doi: 10.1017/S1744133118000129. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Morbidity patterns and healthcare utilisation among older people in Malaysia: 1996-2015.马来西亚老年人的发病模式和医疗保健利用情况:1996-2015 年。
Public Health. 2018 Oct;163:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
7
An investigation of the effect of accessibility to General Practitioner services on healthcare utilisation among older people.一项关于普通科医生服务可及性对老年人医疗利用影响的调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders.优先考虑支持和服务,以帮助老年人就地安享晚年:一项德尔菲研究,比较了家庭/朋友护理伙伴和医疗保健利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0259387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259387. eCollection 2021.
9
Immigrants in the Netherlands: equal access for equal needs?荷兰的移民:需求相同,机会均等?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Oct;55(10):701-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.10.701.
10
Social relations and healthcare utilisation among middle-aged and older people: study protocol for an implementation and register-based study in Denmark.中老年人的社会关系与医疗保健利用:丹麦一项基于实施和登记的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2650-0.

引用本文的文献

1
How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.健康科学领域的德尔菲研究如何达成共识:一项范围综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 14;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3.
2
Forecasting the future of smart hospitals: findings from a real-time delphi study.预测智慧医院的未来:一项实时德尔菲研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1421. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11895-z.
3
Are older people worse off in 2040 regarding health and resources to deal with it? - Future developments in complex health problems and in the availability of resources to manage health problems in the Netherlands.
2040 年,老年人在健康和应对资源方面的情况会更糟吗?——荷兰复杂健康问题的未来发展及管理健康问题资源的可利用性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 16;11:942526. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.942526. eCollection 2023.
4
Development of an index system for evaluating the organisational capabilities of primary medical institutions: a modified Delphi study in China.基层医疗机构组织能力评价指标体系的构建:中国的德尔菲法改良研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e055422. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055422.