Mafra Nicoli Valverde, Ribas Angela, Moretti Claudia, Zeigelboim Bianca Simone, Fonseca Vinicius Ribas, Borburema Rodrigo Marques
Department of Speech Therapy, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Communication Disorders Postgraduate Program, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jul;23(3):e256-e261. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668127. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Speech tests such as logoaudiometry measure the ability to perceive and recognize oral sounds. The Speech Recognition Index (SRI) is one of the speech tests adopted in clinical routine; it uses standardized live voice and recorded speeches. The live voice speech method can be influenced by intra and interspeaker variability, as well as by regionalism variability, whereas recorded tests show consistency in their presentation. Analyzing results of the SRI test applied to live voice and recorded speeches from Paraná State, in different Brazilian counties. The sample comprised 125 individuals, 25 from each county (Rio de Janeiro, Florianópolis, Porto Alegre, Salvador and Curitiba), from both sexes, in the age group 20 to 70 years; the SRI was applied in both techniques. The recorded speech method showed prevalence of hit improvement in Rio de Janeiro (40%), Salvador, Porto Alegre and Florianópolis (28%). Individuals from Salvador and Florianópolis subjected to the recorded speech method showed better results in the left ear. Individuals from Rio de Janeiro and Porto Alegre showed satisfactory results in both ears, whereas those from Curitiba did not show statistically significant difference between the left and the right ear. The recorded CD application method showed prevalence of hit improvement (%) in the SRI responses in comparison to the live voice speech technique in most of the studied counties. According to the hit rate measured in the herein investigated counties, Rio de Janeiro showed the best results in the recorded speech method.
诸如言语测听法之类的言语测试可测量感知和识别口语声音的能力。言语识别指数（SRI）是临床常规采用的言语测试之一；它使用标准化的现场语音和录制语音。现场语音方法可能会受到说话者内部和之间的变异性以及地区差异的影响，而录制测试在呈现方面则具有一致性。
分析应用于巴西不同县来自巴拉那州的现场语音和录制语音的SRI测试结果。
样本包括125名个体，来自里约热内卢、弗洛里亚诺波利斯、阿雷格里港、萨尔瓦多和库里蒂巴每个县各25名，年龄在20至70岁之间，涵盖男女两性；两种技术均应用了SRI。
录制语音方法在里约热内卢（40%）、萨尔瓦多、阿雷格里港和弗洛里亚诺波利斯（28%）显示出命中改善的普遍性。接受录制语音方法的来自萨尔瓦多和弗洛里亚诺波利斯的个体左耳表现出更好的结果。来自里约热内卢和阿雷格里港的个体双耳表现出令人满意的结果，而来自库里蒂巴的个体左耳和右耳之间未显示出统计学上的显著差异。
与现场语音技术相比，在大多数研究的县中，录制CD应用方法在SRI反应中显示出命中改善（%）的普遍性。根据在此调查的县中测量的命中率，里约热内卢在录制语音方法中显示出最好的结果。
