Suppr超能文献

当抵抗徒劳无功时,选择忍受:当植物受到地上和地下食草动物的攻击时,硅会促进植物的补偿性生长。

When resistance is futile, tolerate instead: silicon promotes plant compensatory growth when attacked by above- and belowground herbivores.

机构信息

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2019 Jul 26;15(7):20190361. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0361. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Abstract

Plants have evolved numerous herbivore defences that are resistance- or tolerance-based. Resistance involves physical and chemical traits that deter and/or harm herbivores whereas tolerance minimizes fitness costs of herbivory, often via compensatory growth. The Poaceae frequently accumulate large amounts of silicon (Si), which can be used for herbivore resistance, including biomechanical and (indirectly) biochemical defences. To date, it is unclear whether Si improves tolerance of herbivory. Here we report how Si enabled a cereal (Triticum aestivum) to tolerate damage inflicted by above- and belowground herbivores. Leaf herbivory increased Si concentrations in the leaves by greater than 50% relative to herbivore-free plants, indicating it was an inducible defensive response. In plants without Si supplementation, leaf herbivory reduced shoot biomass by 52% and root herbivory reduced root biomass by 68%. Si supplementation, however, facilitated compensatory growth such that shoot losses were more than compensated for (+14% greater than herbivore-free plants) and root losses were minimized to -16%. Si supplementation did not improve plant resistance since Si did not enhance biomechanical resistance (i.e. force of fracture) or reduce leaf consumption and herbivore relative growth rates. We propose that Si-based defence operates in wheat via tolerance either in addition or as an alternative to resistance-based defence.

摘要

植物进化出了许多基于抗性或耐受性的植食性防御机制。抗性涉及到阻止和/或伤害植食者的物理和化学特性,而耐受性则通过补偿性生长最小化植食性的适应成本。禾本科植物通常会积累大量的硅(Si),硅可以用于抵御植食者,包括生物力学和(间接)生化防御。迄今为止,尚不清楚硅是否能提高对植食性的耐受性。在这里,我们报告了硅如何使一种谷物(小麦)能够耐受地上和地下植食者造成的损害。与无植食者的植物相比,叶片取食使叶片中的硅浓度增加了 50%以上,表明这是一种诱导性的防御反应。在没有硅补充的植物中,叶片取食使地上生物量减少了 52%,根取食使根生物量减少了 68%。然而,硅补充促进了补偿性生长,使地上损失得到了超过补偿(比无植食者的植物多增加 14%),并将根损失降到最低至-16%。硅补充并没有提高植物的抗性,因为硅并没有增强生物力学抗性(即断裂力),也没有减少叶片消耗和植食者的相对生长速率。我们提出,硅基防御机制通过耐受性在小麦中起作用,这种作用是对基于抗性的防御机制的补充,或者是替代基于抗性的防御机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The controversies of silicon's role in plant biology.硅在植物生物学中的作用争议。
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):67-85. doi: 10.1111/nph.15343. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
3
Silicon and Mechanisms of Plant Resistance to Insect Pests.硅与植物抗虫机制
Plants (Basel). 2018 Apr 13;7(2):33. doi: 10.3390/plants7020033.
6
Silicon's Role in Abiotic and Biotic Plant Stresses.硅在非生物和生物植物胁迫中的作用。
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017 Aug 4;55:85-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035312. Epub 2017 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验